1996
DOI: 10.1109/28.485824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary pilot plant tests of a corona discharge-electron beam hybrid combustion flue gas cleaning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, available technologies for NO x reduction include selective catalytic reduction, 2) selective non-catalytic reduction (SCR), 3,4) low-temperature oxidation (LTO) by ozone, [5][6][7][8] non-thermal plasma, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] electron beam irradiation and several hybrid techniques. [27][28][29][30][31] However, despite of this variety, none of these methods is free of limitations concerning the implementation. Additionally, the cost for removing 1 kg of NO x is, in most countries, higher than the cost for reduction, with about 2 Euro per kg of reduced NO x using SCR and double cost for reduction using ozone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, available technologies for NO x reduction include selective catalytic reduction, 2) selective non-catalytic reduction (SCR), 3,4) low-temperature oxidation (LTO) by ozone, [5][6][7][8] non-thermal plasma, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] electron beam irradiation and several hybrid techniques. [27][28][29][30][31] However, despite of this variety, none of these methods is free of limitations concerning the implementation. Additionally, the cost for removing 1 kg of NO x is, in most countries, higher than the cost for reduction, with about 2 Euro per kg of reduced NO x using SCR and double cost for reduction using ozone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the concentration of O 2 and H 2 O increases the generation of OH radicals and results in further removal of SO 2 from flue gas streams. Based on such a NTP device, several pilot-plant tests on DeNOx and DeSOx were considered successful [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large-scale NO x removal using ammonia radicals, plasma processes have been utilized in addition to the electron-beam process. [1][2][3] The plasma processes have attracted attention because of their low equipment costs and simplicity. The reported plasma processes makes use of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD, silent discharge), 4,5) corona discharge 4,6) and surface discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%