1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2134(98)00071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary validation of the child abuse potential inventory in chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of validity, there is evidence that CAPI scores are associated with documented risk factors for child abuse (Budd, Heilman, & Kane, 2000;grietens, De Haene, & Uyteeborek, 2007;Haskett, Scott, & Fann, 1995). Also there is evidence that the composite Abuse scale can successfully discriminate between proven abusers and control subjects (Milner & Wimberley, 1980), and this extends across cultural groups (Haz & Ramirez, 1998). Finally, the Abuse scale has proven to be sensitive to the effects of intervention with high-risk parents (Wolfe, Edwards, Manion, & Koverola, 1988).…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of validity, there is evidence that CAPI scores are associated with documented risk factors for child abuse (Budd, Heilman, & Kane, 2000;grietens, De Haene, & Uyteeborek, 2007;Haskett, Scott, & Fann, 1995). Also there is evidence that the composite Abuse scale can successfully discriminate between proven abusers and control subjects (Milner & Wimberley, 1980), and this extends across cultural groups (Haz & Ramirez, 1998). Finally, the Abuse scale has proven to be sensitive to the effects of intervention with high-risk parents (Wolfe, Edwards, Manion, & Koverola, 1988).…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it appears that the CAPI provides a reliable method of assessing dysfunctional elements of a child's family environment, including several aspects of parental stress that are associated with child abuse. In addition, the composite Abuse scale does seem to be an index of risk for abuse, although it is important to recognize that many parents who score high on the CAPI have no documented evidence of abuse in the home (i.e., false positive) (Haz & Ramirez, 1998).…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies outside the USA have examined the factor structure of the CAPI but could not replicate the original six factor structure reported by Milner (1986) (Diareme et al 1997;Haz and Ramirez 1998;Kawamura et al 2009;Uslu et al 2010). Most studies using the CAPI therefore use the total CAPI Abuse scale as this scale appears to be valid and reliable across different cultural populations (Walker and Davies 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been tested and validated with a number of ethnic groups, including Native Americans, African Americans and Hispanic Americans. The CAP Inventory has been translated and normed in other countries with non‐Americans, for example, Spain (de Paúl et al ., ), Croatia (Pečnik and Ajduković, ), Greece (Diareme et al ., ), Japan (Kawamura et al ., ), Chile (Haz and Ramirez, ), Turkey (Kutsal et al ., ) and Southeast Asia (Mouanoutoua, ). International cross‐validation studies have found that the Abuse scale score correctly discriminates between abusive and non‐abusive individuals across a wide variety of cultures and that it has a similar factorial structure outlined by Milner ().…”
Section: Applications Of the Cap Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%