1987
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb120122.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis: Amniotic cell culture versus chorionic villus sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that second trimester CVS is a safe and suitable option since none of these mothers reported fetal losses. Chorionic villus sampling has the advantage of the early diagnosis of haemophilia A, a shorter delay with results after the diagnostic procedure, and is, for some couples, a more socially and morally acceptable method of antenatal diagnosis [22]. Sampling efficiency and diagnostic reliability is as high as in midtrimester amniocentesis with fewer complications, provided the operator has the required training, skill and experience [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that second trimester CVS is a safe and suitable option since none of these mothers reported fetal losses. Chorionic villus sampling has the advantage of the early diagnosis of haemophilia A, a shorter delay with results after the diagnostic procedure, and is, for some couples, a more socially and morally acceptable method of antenatal diagnosis [22]. Sampling efficiency and diagnostic reliability is as high as in midtrimester amniocentesis with fewer complications, provided the operator has the required training, skill and experience [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%