2018
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal diagnosis and clinical implications of an apparently isolated right aortic arch

Abstract: What is already known about the topic? Right aortic arch (RAA) has an association with extracardiac and chromosomal anomalies. RAA with left arterial duct can form a vascular ring. In children with RAA, there is poor correlation of symptoms and tracheal compression. What does this study add? The majority of prenatal cases of an isolated RAA in our cohort are identified during routine screening. Microdeletion of chromosome 22q11 is the most common genetic association with an apparently isolated RAA, it is se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies detect associated cardiac, noncardiac, and genetic anomalies in a proportion of these cases supporting detailed examination and possible molecular testing. Most also report a 22q11.2 deletion in approximately 5% of those undergoing genetic testing (D'Antonio, Khalil, Zidere, & Carvalho, ; Evans et al, ; Galindo et al, ; O'Mahony, Hutchinson, McGillivray, Nisbet, & Palma‐Dias, ; Peng, Xie, Zheng, Zhou, & Lin, ; Razon et al, ; Vigneswaran et al, ; Wojtowicz et al, ), which is substantially lower than that observed in the post‐natal study (McElhinney, McDonald‐McGinn, et al, ) but consequential nonetheless. Two studies specifically reported on the rare fetal diagnosis of a left‐sided aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery (Ranzini, Hyman, Jamaer, & van Mieghem, ; Rembouskos et al, ).…”
Section: The 22q112 Deletion Syndrome In the Chd Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies detect associated cardiac, noncardiac, and genetic anomalies in a proportion of these cases supporting detailed examination and possible molecular testing. Most also report a 22q11.2 deletion in approximately 5% of those undergoing genetic testing (D'Antonio, Khalil, Zidere, & Carvalho, ; Evans et al, ; Galindo et al, ; O'Mahony, Hutchinson, McGillivray, Nisbet, & Palma‐Dias, ; Peng, Xie, Zheng, Zhou, & Lin, ; Razon et al, ; Vigneswaran et al, ; Wojtowicz et al, ), which is substantially lower than that observed in the post‐natal study (McElhinney, McDonald‐McGinn, et al, ) but consequential nonetheless. Two studies specifically reported on the rare fetal diagnosis of a left‐sided aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery (Ranzini, Hyman, Jamaer, & van Mieghem, ; Rembouskos et al, ).…”
Section: The 22q112 Deletion Syndrome In the Chd Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of associated chromosomal anomalies in cases of iRAA varies among studies, from as high as 28.5% to as low as 0%. In view of this, some authors recommend that invasive prenatal testing for karyotypes and 22q11.2 microdeletion should be offered to all patients with RAA, even in the case of an isolated one, whereas others suggest that the presence of an iRAA may not justify karyotyping. The contradictory evidence confuses prenatal counselling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated ECA were reported only in 4 of the 53 of cases with known neonatal outcome (crude proportion 7.5%), of which none had major anomalies (cleft palate; dolichocephaly; persistent right umbilical vein). Specifically, one had a bilateral ductal arch and a right umbilical vein [ 21 ] another was a DiGeorge syndrome with left pulmonary artery stenosis and cleft palate [ 14 ] and two were dolichocephalic fetuses with dysmorphic features observed at birth (one of the latter had DiGeorge syndrome) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the previous reports support the association between RDA/RAA and other ICA/ECA or Di George syndrome, [ 12 ] while others fail to describe associated abnormalities and/or chromosomal/genetic syndromes [ 7 ]. These controversial results are probably due both to the rarity of the condition and the differences in study designs and settings (lack of risk stratification in the examined populations and/or different expertise of diagnostic methods) [ 7 , 12 , 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation