2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0067-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal Human Ocular Degeneration Occurs in Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas there is severely impaired vision in all LCA1, there is no consensus about whether there are underlying retinal structure abnormalities in such patients. Some reports describe retinal degeneration (Milam et al, 2003;Porto et al, 2003) and others show normal-appearing, noninvasive, cross-sectional retinal images (Simonelli et al, 2007;Pasadhika et al, 2010). Such studies suggest that there may indeed be loss of rod and cone structure as well as function in some LCA1 patients, and it is important to evaluate gene therapies in an animal model exhibiting degeneration as well as dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas there is severely impaired vision in all LCA1, there is no consensus about whether there are underlying retinal structure abnormalities in such patients. Some reports describe retinal degeneration (Milam et al, 2003;Porto et al, 2003) and others show normal-appearing, noninvasive, cross-sectional retinal images (Simonelli et al, 2007;Pasadhika et al, 2010). Such studies suggest that there may indeed be loss of rod and cone structure as well as function in some LCA1 patients, and it is important to evaluate gene therapies in an animal model exhibiting degeneration as well as dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCA is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of severe, early-onset retinal dystrophies characterized by a reduced or absent electroretinogram (ERG), nystagmus, digito-ocular signs, and apparently normal fundus appearance (Perrault et al, 1999). Among the specific LCA1 studies, there are those that describe retinal degeneration (Milam et al, 2003;Porto et al, 2003) and others suggesting no obvious retinal degeneration (Simonelli et al, 2007;Pasadhika et al, 2010). Until a more thorough analysis of patients with GUCY2D mutations is performed, it is unclear to what extent progressive retinal degeneration is part of the human LCA1 disease phenotype and whether there exists a spectrum of disease expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, clinicopathologic observations reported at that time suggested that LCA1 was associated with degeneration of both cones and rods. 37,38 In addition, because it lacked confounding retGC2 activity, this was the only model in which the effects of retGC1 replacement in rods and the functional efficiency of the AAV-delivered enzyme could be precisely determined. In anticipation of possible clinical trials, a thorough clinical characterization of LCA1 was recently performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports on the extent of photoreceptor degeneration associated with this disease have been conflicting. Histopathological analysis of two postmortem retinas (a 26-wk-old preterm abortus and a 12-yr-old donor) revealed signs of photoreceptor degeneration in both rods and cones Porto et al 2003). Later studies using state of the art, in-life imaging (i.e., optical coherence tomography) revealed no obvious degeneration in patients as old as 53 years of age (Simonelli et al 2007;Pasadhika et al 2010).…”
Section: Patient Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, before its 2013 clinical characterization (Jacobson et al 2013), multiple reports described that both cone/rod structure and cone/rod function were compromised in LCA1 Porto et al 2003), suggesting that the best model of this disease was one in which both photoreceptor subclasses were nonfunctional/degenerative. Although the GC1KO mouse is useful for evaluating therapeutic benefit to cones (Boye et al 2010Mihelec et al 2011), residual rod function and preservation of rod structure in this model complicates the ability to evaluate rod therapy.…”
Section: Gc1/gc2 Double Knockout (Gcdko) Mousementioning
confidence: 99%