1986
DOI: 10.1016/0163-6383(86)90025-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns' perception of speech sounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
398
3
12

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 902 publications
(418 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
398
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Horne and Lowe (1996) suggested that the caregiver's voice and sounds function as classically conditioned stimuli that have strong reinforcing effects on the child, so that when the child hears his or her own voice in the echoic, these sounds have reinforcing properties similar to those of the parents. That is, correspondence between what has been heard and what is said serves as a conditioned reinforcer, and in typically developing children this occurs very early (see Decasper & Spence, 1987, for evidence of this effect). Several studies have suggested that correspondence between the behavior of caretakers and children's unreinforced behavior may, in fact, be due to the conditioned reinforcement properties of correspondence itself (Gladstone & Cooley, 1975;Rheingold, Gewirtz, & Ross, 1959).…”
Section: Whence the Original Reinforcement For Naming?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Horne and Lowe (1996) suggested that the caregiver's voice and sounds function as classically conditioned stimuli that have strong reinforcing effects on the child, so that when the child hears his or her own voice in the echoic, these sounds have reinforcing properties similar to those of the parents. That is, correspondence between what has been heard and what is said serves as a conditioned reinforcer, and in typically developing children this occurs very early (see Decasper & Spence, 1987, for evidence of this effect). Several studies have suggested that correspondence between the behavior of caretakers and children's unreinforced behavior may, in fact, be due to the conditioned reinforcement properties of correspondence itself (Gladstone & Cooley, 1975;Rheingold, Gewirtz, & Ross, 1959).…”
Section: Whence the Original Reinforcement For Naming?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on very early development, Decasper and Spence (1987) reported that newborn children emitted auditory observing responses to their mothers' voices and not to other voices, suggesting that in utero conditioning of mothers' voices was responsible. Keohane et al (2006aKeohane et al ( , 2006b) reported a functional relation between conditioned reinforcement for visual tabletop stimuli or auditory speech and accelerated rates of visual discrimination for severely developmentally delayed preschoolers (see also Keohane et al, 2009, andDinsmoor, 1983, for related findings with pigeons).…”
Section: Precursors That Allow the Development Of Namingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 During the past few decades, a series of experiments demonstrated that fetal learning does indeed occur. 1,6 The fetus not only learns the speech characteristics of the mother prenatally, 7 but shortly after birth, infants prefer their mother's voice, 8 a passage recited to them prenatally, 7 and the theme music of a soap opera watched by their mothers during pregnancy. 9 The ability to detect other sensory stimuli, such as tastes and smells, also seems to be developed before birth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the various connotations do not necessarily refer to equivalent or correlated biological phenomena. Preferences observed in newborns are shaped by experiences occurring in utero or before hatching (e.g., DeCasper & Spence, 1986;Gottlieb, 1997;Mampe, Friederici, Cristophe, & Wermke, 2009). Aspects of the nervous system that are present and functional at birth can change during development (e.g., Blakemore & Cooper, 1970;Wiesel & Hubel, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%