2000
DOI: 10.1159/000056839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of partial tetrasomy 10p due to neocentromere formation in an inversion duplication analphoid marker chromosome

Abstract: Neocentromeres are fully functional centromeres found on rearranged or marker chromosomes that have separated from endogenous centromeres. Neocentromeres often result in partial tri- or tetrasomy because their formation confers mitotic stability to acentric chromosome fragments that would normally be lost. We describe the prenatal identification and characterization of a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) containing a neocentromere in a 20-wk fetus by the combined use of comparative genomic hybridiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23][24] Transposition of centromeric sequences into a distinct centromere has been documented in a prenatal diagnosis case. [25] As the inv (9) inherited from parents there is a need to study whether this positional change of centromere in the chromosome is due to per icentric inversion or existence of neocentromere through generations or evolution.…”
Section: No %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24] Transposition of centromeric sequences into a distinct centromere has been documented in a prenatal diagnosis case. [25] As the inv (9) inherited from parents there is a need to study whether this positional change of centromere in the chromosome is due to per icentric inversion or existence of neocentromere through generations or evolution.…”
Section: No %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in humans, the combination of banding methods (G and C banding, Ag-NOR, distamycin A and DAPI staining) with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (Blennow et al, 1995;Ning et al, 1999;Langer et al, 2001;Nietzel et al, 2001;Henegariu et al, 2001;Yaron et al, 2003) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) (Bryndorf et al, 1995;Erdel et al, 1997;Levy et al, 2000) has allowed their complete identification in most cases (Fig. 1), since almost all of them were derived from A chromosomes.…”
Section: Identification Of Hscs By Molecular and Cytogenetic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of conventional FISH techniques using different types of probes, such as whole chromosome painting probes (Rauch et al, 1992), or chromosome specific pericentromeric alphoid satellite probes (Callen et al, 1992;Blennow et al, 1995;Spinner et al, 1995) has allowed one to identify a high number Voullaire et al,1993;Abeliovich et al, 1996;Rivera et al,1999;Levy et al, 2000;Mackie Ogilvie et al, 2001;Li et al, 2002;Amor and Choo, 2002;Spiegel et al, 2003 of HSC. However, to use this approach one needs some previous information to choose the appropriate probe.…”
Section: Identification Of Hscs By Molecular and Cytogenetic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations