2014
DOI: 10.1177/0284185114556929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts disease-free survival in patients with primary invasive ductal breast cancer

Abstract: A high primary tumor SUVmax on 18F-FDG PET/CT was an independent factor associated with worse disease-free survival in patients with primary invasive ductal breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for tumor subtype in the present cohort, the mean maximum SUVmax values for HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors were 7.92 ± 4.59 and 7.16 ± 4.40, respectively, both higher than that for ER-positive/HER2negative tumors (4.59 ± 3.40) (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), findings similar to previous reports [4,6,18]. Other studies of breast cancer have found that primary tumor quantitative FDG-PET/CT parameters are correlated with known prognostic pathological parameters, while those were also shown useful for prognosis prediction without the need for division according to molecular subtype [2,[4][5][6]. More recently, reports regarding the usefulness of volume-based quantitative parameters (SUVmax, MTV, TLG) for predicting prognosis using major receptor types have been presented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As for tumor subtype in the present cohort, the mean maximum SUVmax values for HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors were 7.92 ± 4.59 and 7.16 ± 4.40, respectively, both higher than that for ER-positive/HER2negative tumors (4.59 ± 3.40) (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), findings similar to previous reports [4,6,18]. Other studies of breast cancer have found that primary tumor quantitative FDG-PET/CT parameters are correlated with known prognostic pathological parameters, while those were also shown useful for prognosis prediction without the need for division according to molecular subtype [2,[4][5][6]. More recently, reports regarding the usefulness of volume-based quantitative parameters (SUVmax, MTV, TLG) for predicting prognosis using major receptor types have been presented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although previous studies of stage operable breast cancer patients only evaluated primary tumor quantitative FDG-PET/CT values as imaging biomarkers [2,[4][5][6][18][19][20][21], cases with a lower primary tumor SUVmax value as compared to that for nodal SUVmax are commonly encountered in clinical situations. In the present cohort as well, it was observed in 10.2-30.9% and we defined that as maximum SUVmax, which is considered to be a strong point of this report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is not a diagnostic imaging modality for the presence of metastatic lymph node involvement, but only a sign of the degree of lymphatic drainage. In contrast, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT is a method that directly evaluates metastatic infiltration (2,3,5) and is also relevant for prognosis of the disease (5,6). When evaluating axillary nodes, false-negative and false-positive findings may be obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastectomy performed upon completion of NAC (eight courses) showed no pCR 1 3 controversial. Several authors have suggested that SUV in primary breast cancer [10,[96][97][98][99] or in axillary LN metastasis [34,100] could be predictive of outcome. Jo et al [99] evaluated whether preoperative SUV max of the primary tumor was associated with DFS in 508 patients with invasive ductal breast cancer, along with histological and biological factors such as tumor size, histological grade, or hormonal receptor expression status, and concluded that a high primary tumor SUV max is an independent factor associated with recurrence.…”
Section: Prognostic Valuementioning
confidence: 99%