2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of high efficiency modified activated carbon for the capture of mercury from flue gas in coal-fired power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods have been used for removing heavy metals from aqueous environment such as reverse osmosis, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, coagulation and adsorption [3]. Many carbon-based nanoparticles (CNTs) have been developed to remove heavy metals from aqueous media [2,[4][5][6]. They are promising material for numerous applications due to their unique electrical, mechanical, thermal, optical and chemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been used for removing heavy metals from aqueous environment such as reverse osmosis, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, coagulation and adsorption [3]. Many carbon-based nanoparticles (CNTs) have been developed to remove heavy metals from aqueous media [2,[4][5][6]. They are promising material for numerous applications due to their unique electrical, mechanical, thermal, optical and chemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 displays the XRD patterns of the prepared samples. The broad peak centered at around 25 • can be assigned to the (002) reflection of the AC substrate [31,32], which verified the existence of micro-graphitic structure of the AC. Another sharp peak centered at 28.4 • can also be clearly observed for all samples, which can be assigned to the characteristic XRD pattern of the loaded HgCl 2 species [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Similar experimental work and modeling attempts were investigated by Chen and co-workers, Serre et al, and Scala [15][16][17][18][19]. Many other researches thoroughly deal with experimental evaluation for the capability of various adsorbents to remove effectively the mercury species [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Hence, chemical trapping of mercury in the form of cinnabar, a stable nonvolatile mercury ore, is the most commonly used mercury removal method for natural gas [52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Commercial trapping products differ in the nature of the trapping agent and/or the support material. The principle types of mercury trapping agents are elemental sulfur, metal sulfides, metal oxides, activated carbon, iodine, silver, and gold [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Silver and gold active phases are simply based on effective amalgamation removal with regeneration potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%