2014
DOI: 10.1186/2052-336x-12-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of poly (ethersulfone) nanofiltration membranes for amoxicillin removal from contaminated water

Abstract: Nowadays, antibiotics such as amoxicillin have been entered in water bodies. Nanofiltration has been proposed as an attractive technology for removal of antibiotics from aquatic environment instead of conventional wastewater treatment. In this paper, novel asymmetric flat sheet nanofiltration membranes were prepared via immersion precipitation technique and by using the poly(ethersulfone)/Brij®S100/Poly(vinylpirrolidone)/1-methyl-2-pyrolidone casting solutions. The effect of addition of Brij®S100 as a non-ioni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then it achieved a maximum at 0.4 wt % and finally experienced a sharp drop with further additions of n ‐C 6 e.g., 0.6 wt %. PWF is directly correlated with the skin layer pore size, surface porosity, as well as sublayer morphology and porosity; therefore, the PWF results were in a good agreement with the above parameters as reported in Table . The same similarity was observed for n ‐C 10 and n ‐C 14 additives between PWF and solute rejection results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Then it achieved a maximum at 0.4 wt % and finally experienced a sharp drop with further additions of n ‐C 6 e.g., 0.6 wt %. PWF is directly correlated with the skin layer pore size, surface porosity, as well as sublayer morphology and porosity; therefore, the PWF results were in a good agreement with the above parameters as reported in Table . The same similarity was observed for n ‐C 10 and n ‐C 14 additives between PWF and solute rejection results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This can be explained by Hansen solubility parameters, such as faster demixing rate in MS-1 which resulted in porous structure, hence hydrophilicity, whereas, in MS-2, the P-S value dropped to 2.68 MPa 1/2 . This resulted in relatively less thermodynamically stable solution and better demixing leading to porosity on surface [53].…”
Section: Polymer Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations have revealed that increasing the membrane surface hydrophilicity can effectively reduce the membrane fouling [ 9 , 11 ]. Therefore, efforts have focused on increasing PES hydrophilicity by chemical or physical modifications such as UV irradiation [ 12 ], addition of additive [ 9 , 13 15 ], plasma treatment [ 16 , 17 ], and so on. Addition of surfactant additives to the casting solutions can influence morphology and performance of membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%