2012
DOI: 10.1163/156855511x615001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Polyester–Glycidyl Methacrylate PolyHIPE Monoliths to Use in Heavy Metal Removal

Abstract: Polyester-glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)-based poly(high internal phase emulsion)s (polyHIPEs) with 85% internal phase were prepared by using unsaturated polyester resin (UPR), glycidyl metahacrylate and divinylbenzene (DVB) or styrene (St) with triethanolamine (TEA) as an emulsifier in the presence of a porogen. Porous monoliths were obtained by a removal of internal phase after curing of dispersed phase at 80°C. Morphologies and surface properties of obtained porous monoliths were investigated by scanning elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These hierarchically porous materials, known as polyHIPEs, have huge amount of voids and windows (or throats, the small pores connecting the neighbor voids) by removal of the internal phase. PolyHIPEs have advantages such as high permeability, easy preparation, facile control of voids and windows size, etc., which are being considered for myriad applications such as in filtration media for separation [4][5][6][7][8], support for catalyst [9][10][11], scaffold for tissue engineering [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], adsorbent for scavenging [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and storage for hydrogen [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hierarchically porous materials, known as polyHIPEs, have huge amount of voids and windows (or throats, the small pores connecting the neighbor voids) by removal of the internal phase. PolyHIPEs have advantages such as high permeability, easy preparation, facile control of voids and windows size, etc., which are being considered for myriad applications such as in filtration media for separation [4][5][6][7][8], support for catalyst [9][10][11], scaffold for tissue engineering [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], adsorbent for scavenging [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and storage for hydrogen [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decreased rigidity would compromise the material's ability to function as a high pressure stationary phase. An alternative potential strategy is to incorporate an additional component into the polymerisation mixture to increase the surface area of the material [17]. Previously, polymer monoliths have been chemically modified to allow for nanoparticle (NP) attachment as a means to increase surface area [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, polyHIPEs' bulk structure as compared to nano-materials in powder form has an advantage that polyHIPE material can be easily removed from aqueous solutions after the adsorption process. As it is reported in the literature; many polyHIPEs functionalized with different chemical agents for the removal of varied pollutants from aquatic media have served as alternative adsorbents (16)(17)(18). Pulko et al reported the removal of atrazine from aqueous solutions with functionalized 4-nitrophenylacrylate polyHIPEs (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%