2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2473286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Rubber Blends for Industrial Tire Tread Fabrication

Abstract: The physico-mechanical properties of variable rubber blends including epoxide natural rubber (ENR), polybutadiene rubber (BR), and solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) filled with silanized silica and carbon black mixtures were explored. The tensile, hardness, resilience, abrasion, and fatigue behavior were investigated. An optimized composition involving 30 phr of ENR and 70 phr SBR filled with mixtures of carbon blacks and silanized silica was proposed to be a suitable composition for the futu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
34
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It could also be seen from Figure 6 that the hardness of sample W was slightly greater than the sample S under the same amount of carbon black. The possible reason was that the crosslinking density of the SMR20 and BR9000 blends was greater than the SMR20 and SBR1502E blends 30 . Comparing with the W and the S in Figure 7, it can be seen that the surface of sample W is smoother than that of S , which further indicates that SMR20 and BR9000 have stronger interaction with fillers and greater hardness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It could also be seen from Figure 6 that the hardness of sample W was slightly greater than the sample S under the same amount of carbon black. The possible reason was that the crosslinking density of the SMR20 and BR9000 blends was greater than the SMR20 and SBR1502E blends 30 . Comparing with the W and the S in Figure 7, it can be seen that the surface of sample W is smoother than that of S , which further indicates that SMR20 and BR9000 have stronger interaction with fillers and greater hardness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It can be seen from Figure 7 a that the addition of EEUG caused the T c10 of the rubber compound to fluctuate slightly. This is because the internal epoxy group of the EEUG in the rubber compound opened and crosslinked under the action of heat or a coupling agent, thereby affecting the T c10 [ 53 , 54 ]. Both MTES-modified SiO 2 and the addition of EEUG reduced the T c90 and M L of the compound, while the maximum torque ( M H ) and the torque difference ( M H -M L ) increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the good compatibility of SiO 2 and the matrix increased the bonding strength between the filler and the matrix. This prevented it from being easily damaged during the friction process, so the abrasion volume was reduced [ 54 ]. Moreover, the better the dispersion of SiO 2 particles, the more difficult the path of crack propagation, the smoother the path of stress transmission to the SiO 2 particles, and the less likely the composite will form cracks on its surface [ 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main components waste tire aggregate consists of are the natural and synthetic rubber (also known as a polymer). The styrene-butadiene in the synthetic rubber ratio influences the properties of the polymer: with high styrene content, the rubbers are harder and less rubbery, and takes a longer time to dissolve under normal conditions, which leads to a rise in environmental concern when it ends life service [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Currently, the worldwide growth of the automobile industry and the increase in car use have tremendously boosted tire production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%