2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and performance of thermoplastic starch and microcrystalline cellulose for packaging composites: Extrusion and hot pressing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
32
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, to obtain information on the hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of the TPS-resin-based materials, the surface wettability was determined by water contact angle measurements ( Table 1 ). The neat TPS sample showed the lowest water contact angle value due to the number of hydroxyl groups from the native starch as well as glycerol, showing similar values to those reported for corn starch (with 25% amylose content) based formulations plasticized with glycerol [ 55 ]. Meanwhile, all TPS-resin blends showed higher WCA values than neat TPS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, to obtain information on the hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of the TPS-resin-based materials, the surface wettability was determined by water contact angle measurements ( Table 1 ). The neat TPS sample showed the lowest water contact angle value due to the number of hydroxyl groups from the native starch as well as glycerol, showing similar values to those reported for corn starch (with 25% amylose content) based formulations plasticized with glycerol [ 55 ]. Meanwhile, all TPS-resin blends showed higher WCA values than neat TPS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Likewise, all TPS-resin formulations became smaller and breakable, losing between 14% and 19% of the initial mass. The higher mass observed after one day for neat TPS can be related to the fact that starch absorbed water and swelled [ 55 ]. The loss of transparency is linked to the changes in the refractive index because of water absorption and the beginning of the formation of low molecular weight compounds as a result of hydrolytic degradation [ 22 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) is mostly used as a filler because of its outstanding properties such as high crystallinity, high strength, low thermal expansion coefficient, low cost, low density, biodegradability, and no environmental pollution after disposal (Chen et al 2020). MCC can be produced from any material having a high content of cellulose by acid and alkali hydrolysis (Trache et al 2016), ultrasonic and extrusion methods (Abdullah et al 2016), steam explosion and radiation enzymatic process (Henriksson et al 2007) in order to use in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, packaging and polymer composite industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the hydrophobicity of PE, even under continuous pressure, the water vapor generated during hot-pressing cannot pass through the PE side or escape from the decorative veneer surface. Previous studies have shown that about 80% of the water vapor accumulated between the bonding interfaces will escape at the moment of pressure release [29,30]. Under the impact of this steam, the cavity caused by bonding failure during hot-pressing was further expanded.…”
Section: Overlaying Performance Of Pe Film Reinforced Veneermentioning
confidence: 98%