1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.44.5738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation-dependent Co/Si(100) (2×1) interface growth: Spontaneous silicide formation versus interstitial-site mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
29
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
29
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2a (0.1-1.3 ML), the Co atoms were assumed to be adsorbed on top of the Si surface and to occupy sites in the (100) Si layers, exclusively. The latter follows the results of Meyerheim et al [9], indicating that at low Co coverage the Co atoms take tetrahedral interstitial sites in the Si lattice and four-fold hollow sites in the first Si layer, which all are allocated on (100) Si planes. We would like to note that we can exclude the growth of islands during Co deposition: from an Auger study, Gallego et al [16] derived layer-by-layer growth of Co with some Si intermixed during deposition at room temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2a (0.1-1.3 ML), the Co atoms were assumed to be adsorbed on top of the Si surface and to occupy sites in the (100) Si layers, exclusively. The latter follows the results of Meyerheim et al [9], indicating that at low Co coverage the Co atoms take tetrahedral interstitial sites in the Si lattice and four-fold hollow sites in the first Si layer, which all are allocated on (100) Si planes. We would like to note that we can exclude the growth of islands during Co deposition: from an Auger study, Gallego et al [16] derived layer-by-layer growth of Co with some Si intermixed during deposition at room temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It should be noted that this result is different from results for Co growth on Si(100) at room temperature by our group [13] (see also Fig. 2c) and by Meyerheim et al [9], where only an incorporation of Co in the top-most Si layer was observed. The next layer, layer '0' in Fig.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if our experimental results cannot totally exclude Co diffusion into the Si subsurface, we have associated these protrusions to Co adatoms, in agreement with previous experimental studies of Co adsorption on Si(100)2 × 1 in the submonolayer range at room temperature. [15,16,17] The dangling bonds of the Si surface are preferably saturated by adsorbed species to reduce the surface energy. [18] Fig.…”
Section: Illustration Of the Use Of The Si Nanostripe Array As A Tempmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a heterostructure of a Co thin film on a Si substrate, any structural disorder at the interface would drastically reduce the spin polarization at the interface and, hence, the spin injection efficiency [5,6]. As understood from the growth of Co on Si (100) at room temperature, Co atoms diffuse into the Si lattice and occupy tetrahedral interstitial sites in the Si matrix which is the main cause for the weakening of Si-Si bonds [7][8][9]. These weakened bonds allow Si atoms to diffuse out to the surface and form silicide-like phases which, in turn, cause spin depolarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%