2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.06.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of anhydrous iron fluoride with porous fusiform structure and its application for Li-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better understand the electrochemical performances of these two samples, EIS tests were performed and shown in Figure 4f. Each profile is composed of a sloped line in the low‐frequency region and a semicircle in the high‐frequency range, which reflect the Li + diffusion impedance in the solid electrode and the charge transfer resistance ( R ct ) at the electrolyte/electrode interface, respectively [17,32] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand the electrochemical performances of these two samples, EIS tests were performed and shown in Figure 4f. Each profile is composed of a sloped line in the low‐frequency region and a semicircle in the high‐frequency range, which reflect the Li + diffusion impedance in the solid electrode and the charge transfer resistance ( R ct ) at the electrolyte/electrode interface, respectively [17,32] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3c ] The peaks at 23.8°, 33.4°, 40.1°, 48.7°, and 54.2° of the FeF 3 @C‐Asphalt composite corresponds to the (012), (104), (113), (024), and (116) plane of FeF 3 , which manifest the implant and fluorination of Fe 3 O 4 . [ 24 ] Additionally, the surface chemical element information from the XPS spectra also confirms the existence of F, Fe, C, and O, respectively (Figure S6a, Supporting Information). The Fe:F radio is calculated to be 1:3, which is consistent with the XRD results (Table S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…045-1062), and no peak of FeF 3 •0.33H 2 O can be observed. Previous reports indicated that FeF 3 •3H 2 O was dehydrated to form small nanoparticles at 180°C, followed by the formation of FeF 3 •0.33H 2 O nanorods [21][22][23]. The presence of a small amount of glucose partially reduced Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ (Fig.…”
Section: Structure and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 83%