2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta10439h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of hierarchical C@MoS2@C sandwiched hollow spheres for lithium ion batteries

Abstract: Hierarchical C@MoS 2 @C hollow spheres with the active MoS 2 nanosheets being sandwiched by carbon layers have been produced by means of a modified template method. The process applies polydopamine (PDA) layers which inhibit morphology change of the template thereby enforcing the hollow microsphere structure. In addition, PDA forms complexes with the Mo precursor, leading to an in-situ growth of MoS 2 on its surface and preventing the nanosheets from agglomeration. It also supplies the carbon that finally sand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the Coulombic efficiency increased to nearly 100% from the second cycle in Figure b, and the discharge capacity was 931 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles at a current density of 0.1 A g −1 . The capacities are superior to many MoS 2 ‐based electrodes such as MoS 2 /PANI (801 mAh g −1 at 100 mA g −1 after 50 cycles), C@MoS 2 @C hollow spheres (856mAh g −1 at 67 mA g −1 after 100 cycles), MoS 2 /3D graphene (877 mAh g −1 at 100 mA g −1 after 50 cycles) . The outstanding performance was attributed to the composite construction of G/MoS 2 , which prevented the restack of MoS 2 nanosheets and promoted the transportation of lithium ion and electron in charging and discharging processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meanwhile, the Coulombic efficiency increased to nearly 100% from the second cycle in Figure b, and the discharge capacity was 931 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles at a current density of 0.1 A g −1 . The capacities are superior to many MoS 2 ‐based electrodes such as MoS 2 /PANI (801 mAh g −1 at 100 mA g −1 after 50 cycles), C@MoS 2 @C hollow spheres (856mAh g −1 at 67 mA g −1 after 100 cycles), MoS 2 /3D graphene (877 mAh g −1 at 100 mA g −1 after 50 cycles) . The outstanding performance was attributed to the composite construction of G/MoS 2 , which prevented the restack of MoS 2 nanosheets and promoted the transportation of lithium ion and electron in charging and discharging processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the volume change of MoS 2 is significantly less than that in silicon-based electrodes, the theoretical 103% volume expansion via the conversion reaction of MoS 2 to Li 2 S and molybdenum will still lead to depressed cycling stability and rate performance [18][19][20][21]. The intrinsically limited conductivity, restacking of MoS 2 nanosheets, side reactions between Li 2 S and electrolyte, and polysulfide dissolution during cycling can further aggravate the degradation of electrochemical performance [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another peak at 0.58 V is related to the conversion of Li x MoS 2 into metal Mo and Li 2 S. In the subsequent cycles, the two peaks are not observed and the CV curves appear three new peaks located at 1.87 V, 1.06 V and 0.3 V, respectively. These three peaks are attributed to the following reaction equation (1), (2) and (3), respectively , true2Li++normalS+2e-Li2normalS trueMoS2+xLi++xe-LixMoS2 trueLixMoS2+(4-x)4ptLi++(4-x)4ptnormale-Mo+2Li2normalS …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%