2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of nanoporous composite carbon membrane for separation of rhodamine B dye

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption is an excellent alternative selection especially using inexpensive and high adsorption capacity adsorbent without requiring any additional pre-treatment step before application. Adsorption is superior to other wastewater treatment techniques in terms of its initial cost, flexibility and simplicity of design, ease of operation and insensitivity to toxic pollutants [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption is an excellent alternative selection especially using inexpensive and high adsorption capacity adsorbent without requiring any additional pre-treatment step before application. Adsorption is superior to other wastewater treatment techniques in terms of its initial cost, flexibility and simplicity of design, ease of operation and insensitivity to toxic pollutants [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, dyes wastewater was usually treated by physical and/or chemical methods, such as coagulation and flocculation [5], membrane separation [6], activated carbon adsorption [7], electrochemical removal [8], and photochemical degradation [9]. However, for the developing counties, these methods are still too expensive to be used widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is carcinogenic. The common Rhodamine B removal processes include: physical-chemical, chemical, and biological methods, such as coagulant sedimentation (Sadri Moghaddam, Alavi Moghaddam, & Arami, 2010), membrane separation (Sachdeva & Kumar, 2009), adsorption(D. Karadag, Turan, Akgul, Tok, & Faki, 2007), chemical oxidation (El-Desoky, Ghoneim, El-Sheikh, & Zidan, 2010), ion exchange method (Labanda, Sabaté, & Llorens, 2009), and aerobe and anaerobe degradation methods (Li, Zhang, Lin, Han, & Lei, 2010). Among these, the adsorption method is regarded to be an effective method for the removal of dyes from water (Chatterjee, Lee, Lee, & Woo, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%