2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of Superwetting Porous Materials for Ultrafast Separation of Water-in-Oil Emulsions

Abstract: Functional materials with a superwetting surface property have been extensively explored to achieve emulsion separation. In this paper, we report a simple and inexpensive method for fabricating superhydrophobic/superoleophilic porous materials from polymeric sponges. These microstructured porous materials, which do not contain any fluorinated compounds, maintain their superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity after long-term organic solvent immersion and display environmental stability. These superhydrophobic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach has some disadvantages, such as high cost, complicated modification, and the bonding strength between the nanofibers and the SiO 2 nanoparticles cannot be guaranteed during the operation. The other strategy is the direct use of commercial sponges and metal foams with 3D structures (most of them with pore size from 100 to 500 µm) as the substrates, followed by the postmodification to achieve the required pore structure and wettability. In this case, the mainframe of the filters is fixed so that the pore size cannot be drastically tuned, which renders these materials unfavorable in separating emulsions with droplet sizes less than 20 µm despite their high flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach has some disadvantages, such as high cost, complicated modification, and the bonding strength between the nanofibers and the SiO 2 nanoparticles cannot be guaranteed during the operation. The other strategy is the direct use of commercial sponges and metal foams with 3D structures (most of them with pore size from 100 to 500 µm) as the substrates, followed by the postmodification to achieve the required pore structure and wettability. In this case, the mainframe of the filters is fixed so that the pore size cannot be drastically tuned, which renders these materials unfavorable in separating emulsions with droplet sizes less than 20 µm despite their high flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as previously stated, the lifetime of such a filter remains uncertain. Superhydrophobic surfaces have gained attention in different fields of interest, such as water repelled surfaces for self-cleaning materials [25,26], production of anti-corrosion and anti-fouling surfaces [27] as well as oil-water separation [23,24,28,29].…”
Section: Concepts Superhydrophobic Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study: (i) a hydrophilic glass membrane and (ii) a superhydrophobic filter are considered. As described by other works, mainly two different types of filtration methods can be listed for separating water in oil emulsions: hydrophilic membranes, which work as a coalescence separator [20,21] and superhydrophobic filter, which are permeable to the oil phase and impermeable to the aqueous phase [22][23][24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the high compressibility provided a facile basis for energy‐efficient and environment friendly removal of the absorbed oil, compared to the other existing approaches‐such as refluxing, burning etc . The low density (≈10 mg cm −3 ), high porosity (average pore size of 150±5 μm) of melamine foam inherently allowed greater absorption of the oily phase, selectively, after embedding the selected spongy substrate with artificial superhydrophobicity . However, in literature till date the demonstration of oil/water separation at practically relevant severe settings has barely been demonstrated with the superhydrophobic MF sponge, likely due to the poor durability of the embedded superhydrophobicity in the reported materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31,32] The lowd ensity ( % 10 mg cm À3 ), high porosity (average pore size of 150 AE 5 mm) of melamine foam inherently allowed greater absorption of the oily phase, selectively,a fter embedding the selected spongy substrate with artificial superhydrophobicity. [33][34][35][36][37][38] However, in literature till date the demonstration of oil/water separation at practically relevant severe settings has barely been demonstrated with the superhydrophobic MF sponge, likely due to the poor durability of the embedded superhydrophobicity in the reported materials. For instance, Li et al [39] synthesized the graphydene based melamine foam for selective absorption of the oil phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%