2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of supported nano-sized cobalt oxide and fcc cobalt crystallites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all four preparation methods tested here it was aimed to yield cobalt oxide crystallites smaller than 15 nm. Due to the differences in the reverse micelle composition in the preparation process of the four studied samples (see Table 1) we do not expect the same crystallite sizes [17]. However, the crystallite size is at this stage only of secondary interest as the main focus lies on the nature of the cobalt phase and its behaviour during reduction/activation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all four preparation methods tested here it was aimed to yield cobalt oxide crystallites smaller than 15 nm. Due to the differences in the reverse micelle composition in the preparation process of the four studied samples (see Table 1) we do not expect the same crystallite sizes [17]. However, the crystallite size is at this stage only of secondary interest as the main focus lies on the nature of the cobalt phase and its behaviour during reduction/activation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The so called reverse micelles form in the oil rich area of the ternary phase diagram. The stability region of the reverse micelles and its temperature dependency were determined previously [17].…”
Section: Preparation Of Supported Cobalt Nano Crystallitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first region is attributed to the Co3O4 reduction into CoO and the second one to its further reduction to metallic cobalt. 23 The TPR profile of the supports (without the presence of metals) show negligible hydrogen consumption in comparison to the Co-Na-Mo supported systems except the ceria support which presents a small reduction peak at ~850 C related to the reduction of bulk oxygen and its consequent decomposition. 24 The data in Figure 2 is normalised per mass of catalysts and therefore, differences in the amplitude of the peaks provide information related the degree of reduction of cobalt and molybdenum in the catalysts as well as the interaction with the support, however, it is important to notice that the catalysts are pre-reduced at 300 °C (shadowed area in Figure 2).…”
Section: Effect Of Support On Co2 Conversion and Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows the H 2 -TPR profile of SiO 2 -supported cobalt nanocatalyst prepared via the impregnation and reverse microemulsion methods. The first reduction stage (around 350 ºC) corresponds to reduction of Co 3 O 4 to CoO while the peak around 400 ºC was for the reduction of CoO to Co 0 (Fishcer et al, 2011). The Co/SiO 2 sample prepared via the reverse microemulsion method exhibited a second reduction stage at 700 ºC, which was much higher compared to that obtained for the sample prepared via the impregnation method indicating poorer reducibility, possibly due to strong metal-support interactions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Physicochemical Properties Between Catalysts Pmentioning
confidence: 89%