2002
DOI: 10.1080/08878730209555294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing teachers for full inclusion: Is it possible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children who did not respond to traditional teaching, and did not learn as efficiently as their peers, were tested and categorised by medical professionals (Mock & Kauffman, 2002). Teachers who specialised in teaching exceptional children were trained in the educational, physical, social, medical and emotional effects of different categories of disability on learning and behaviour (Mock & Kauffman, 2002).…”
Section: The Traditional Special Education Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children who did not respond to traditional teaching, and did not learn as efficiently as their peers, were tested and categorised by medical professionals (Mock & Kauffman, 2002). Teachers who specialised in teaching exceptional children were trained in the educational, physical, social, medical and emotional effects of different categories of disability on learning and behaviour (Mock & Kauffman, 2002).…”
Section: The Traditional Special Education Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children who did not respond to traditional teaching, and did not learn as efficiently as their peers, were tested and categorised by medical professionals (Mock & Kauffman, 2002). Teachers who specialised in teaching exceptional children were trained in the educational, physical, social, medical and emotional effects of different categories of disability on learning and behaviour (Mock & Kauffman, 2002). They were also trained in behaviourist pedagogy, such as direct instruction and mastery learning (Mock & Kauffman, 2002), becoming skilled in the application and interpretation of a variety of assessment and testing methods such as curriculum based assessment and standardised achievement tests (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2001;Mock & Kauffman, 2002).…”
Section: The Traditional Special Education Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research evidence investigating inclusion clearly suggests caution regardless of the ideological impetus to move forward not only in terms of interventions (MacMillan et al, 1996;Salend & Garrick Duhaney, 1999), but also in terms of logical extensions in the real world (Mock & Kauffman, 2002). Presently, the beliefs and operations of general education have not been uniformly supportive and suggest the need for careful and reasoned implementation (Downing et al, 1997;Idol, 1997), the exact opposite of what full inclusionists demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The focus on instruction has been downplayed in the movement toward full inclusion of students with developmental disabilities in regular schools and classrooms (Hall, 2002;Mock & Kauffman, 2002. The emphasis on consultation between special education and general education teachers rather than direct service to students with developmental disabilities by special educators has exacerbated this lack of focus on specialized instruction and training.…”
Section: Monitoring or Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%