2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preschool Psychopathology Reported by Parents in 23 Societies: Testing the Seven-Syndrome Model of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5

Abstract: Objective To test the fit of a seven-syndrome model to ratings of preschoolers' problems by parents in very diverse societies. Method Parents of 19,106 children 18 to 71 months of age from 23 societies in Asia, Australasia, Europe, the Middle East, and South America completed the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5 (CBCL/1.5–5). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the seven-syndrome model separately for each society. Results The primary model fit index, the root mean square error of approxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
179
0
14

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
179
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Mothers filled out the CBCL/1½-5 at 6 years of age (as a large proportion of children were younger than 6 years). The Dutch version of the CBCL/1½-5 is reliable and well validated and the subscales for syndromes derived from the CBCL/1½-5 have been consistent across 23 international studies involving diverse societies (Ivanova et al, 2010). The five scales (Affective Problems, Anxiety Problems, Pervasive Developmental Problems, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems, and Oppositional Defiant Problems) can be derived from the CBCL/1½-5 are consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th edition diagnostic categories.…”
Section: Child Behavioral and Emotional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Mothers filled out the CBCL/1½-5 at 6 years of age (as a large proportion of children were younger than 6 years). The Dutch version of the CBCL/1½-5 is reliable and well validated and the subscales for syndromes derived from the CBCL/1½-5 have been consistent across 23 international studies involving diverse societies (Ivanova et al, 2010). The five scales (Affective Problems, Anxiety Problems, Pervasive Developmental Problems, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems, and Oppositional Defiant Problems) can be derived from the CBCL/1½-5 are consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th edition diagnostic categories.…”
Section: Child Behavioral and Emotional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…la Propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Conductas Infantiles (CBCL/1.5-5) y del Informe... estrecha interrelación entre el factor reactividad emocional y ansiosodepresivo ha sido observada en estudios en diversas sociedades; sin embargo, la fusión de ambos factores no muestra siempre ser la mejor opción (Ivanova et al, 2007). anteriores estudios, en muestras chilenas, habían mostrado adecuados ajustes del modelo original de la CBCL (Ivanova et al, 2010;ivanova et al, 2011;lecannelier et al, 2014) pero no así para la c-trF (ivanova et al, 2011). aun cuando se observó una consistencia interna de la mayoría de los factores de primer orden aceptable y comparable, aunque más baja en general, que la obtenida por los autores de los instrumentos, el uso más confiable de los instrumentos está dado por las escalas amplias de internalización, externalización y total.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The 8-day stability estimate and the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of internalizing and externalizing syndrome scales of CBCL/1½-5 vary between 0.88 and 0.92 (29). The reliability and validity of the Dutch translation has been demonstrated (30), and the syndrome scales derived from CBCL/1½-5 had a good fit in 23 studies across diverse societies (31).…”
Section: Problem Behaviormentioning
confidence: 98%