2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preschoolers' brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension

Abstract: Sentence comprehension requires the integration of both syntactic and semantic information, the acquisition of which seems to have different trajectories in the developing brain. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined the neural correlates underlying syntactic and semantic processing during auditory sentence comprehension as well as its development in preschool children by manipulating case marking and animacy hierarchy cues, respectively. A functional segregation was observed within Broca's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The left fronto‐temporal network for syntactic processing has been supported by neuroimaging evidence from German (e.g., Bornkessel, Zysset, Friederici, von Cramon, & Schlesewsky, ; Fiebach, Schlesewsky, Lohmann, von Cramon, & Friederici, ; Goucha & Friederici, ; Grewe et al, ; Wu, Vissiennon, Friederici, & Brauer, ), French (e.g., Pallier et al, ; Pattamadilok, Dehaene, & Pallier, ), and English (e.g., Constable et al, ; Mack, Meltzer‐Asscher, Barbieri, & Thompson, ). If syntactic computation is the fundamental linguistic capacity in all human languages regardless of typological differences, it is plausible that the same brain region is dedicated to syntactic computation universally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The left fronto‐temporal network for syntactic processing has been supported by neuroimaging evidence from German (e.g., Bornkessel, Zysset, Friederici, von Cramon, & Schlesewsky, ; Fiebach, Schlesewsky, Lohmann, von Cramon, & Friederici, ; Goucha & Friederici, ; Grewe et al, ; Wu, Vissiennon, Friederici, & Brauer, ), French (e.g., Pallier et al, ; Pattamadilok, Dehaene, & Pallier, ), and English (e.g., Constable et al, ; Mack, Meltzer‐Asscher, Barbieri, & Thompson, ). If syntactic computation is the fundamental linguistic capacity in all human languages regardless of typological differences, it is plausible that the same brain region is dedicated to syntactic computation universally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…An adjustment was justified due to the fact that some of the items were not suitable for children (e.g., using a broom, writing a letter), which were excluded from the Inventory in the present study. This modified version has been frequently and successfully used in previous studies (Skeide et al, 2016; Wu et al, 2016), resulting in a continuous score as an indicator of the extent of handedness. After exclusion, a total of 56 children (26 girls) were included in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, which varied sentence case-marking and semantic plausibility, the localization of case-marking only became gradually independent from semantics between the ages of 3 and 7 years. A more recent fMRI study, again investigating the processing of syntactic (case-marking) and semantic (animacy) cues during sentence comprehension ( Wu, Vissiennon, Friederici, & Brauer, 2016 ), found developmental brain activation differences in relation to these cues. In adults, a functional dissociation of Broca's area in the left IFG was observed, with the main effect of syntactic case-marking in left BA 44 and the main effect of semantic animacy in left BA 45.…”
Section: Processing Case Markers In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 98%