2019
DOI: 10.3375/043.039.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed Fire Effects on Water Quality and Freshwater Ecosystems in Moist-Temperate Eastern North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The laboratory extraction study confirmed this hypothesis as well; aromaticity of the DOM leaching from vegetation was not significant between the two watersheds (Table 2). This agrees with previous studies suggesting that low-intensity prescribed fire may not significantly change DOM composition and only high-intensity fire results in increased DOM aromaticity (Wang et al 2015;Coates et al 2017;Hahn et al 2019).…”
Section: Monthly Field Monitoringsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The laboratory extraction study confirmed this hypothesis as well; aromaticity of the DOM leaching from vegetation was not significant between the two watersheds (Table 2). This agrees with previous studies suggesting that low-intensity prescribed fire may not significantly change DOM composition and only high-intensity fire results in increased DOM aromaticity (Wang et al 2015;Coates et al 2017;Hahn et al 2019).…”
Section: Monthly Field Monitoringsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…USLE-Forest values might indicate potential soil erosion and subsequent water quality effects, which may include sedimentation, eutrophication, increased water temperatures, and altered aquatic habitats. In a recent literature review of prescribed fire water quality effects, Hahn et al [38] determined that very few prescribed fires in the eastern United States, regardless of intensity, had drastic water quality impacts. Impacts were generally related to vegetative cover type, slope position, and the time since fire when measurements were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is extensive research on prescribed fire effects on soil hydrophobicity in southern Europe (Ferreira et al, 2005;Shakesby et al, 1993), there are limited contemporary data on nutrient response to prescribed fire in this region. Many of the nutrient concentration or export increases after prescribed fire may represent an Assart effect: an ephemeral nutrient pulse after disturbance (Hahn et al, 2018). Whether or not these increases in nutrient concentrations constitute eutrophication and negatively affect stream ecosystems is still questionable due to the magnitude and limited duration of increased concentrations (Table 2).…”
Section: Nutrient Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%