2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribing practices and asthma control with hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone and fluticasone: A real-world observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
56
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are strengthened by a similar study showing that asthmatic patients treated with extrafine-particle HFA-beclomethasone more frequently achieve asthma control than those treated with coarse-particle treatment with either CFC-or HFA-fluticasone. 111 This is in line with results of 2 further real-life cross-sectional studies showing that the use of extrafine-particle HFA-beclomethasone/formoterol was associated with a higher percentage of patients with wellcontrolled asthma based on their Asthma Control Test and ACQ scores than the use of fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol combination treatment. 112,113 Taken together, these studies show that extrafine-particle pressurized metered-dose inhalers might have additional clinical benefits in the treatment of asthma compared with coarse-particle treatment.…”
Section: Effect Of Asthma Treatment On Small-airways Function and Symsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are strengthened by a similar study showing that asthmatic patients treated with extrafine-particle HFA-beclomethasone more frequently achieve asthma control than those treated with coarse-particle treatment with either CFC-or HFA-fluticasone. 111 This is in line with results of 2 further real-life cross-sectional studies showing that the use of extrafine-particle HFA-beclomethasone/formoterol was associated with a higher percentage of patients with wellcontrolled asthma based on their Asthma Control Test and ACQ scores than the use of fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol combination treatment. 112,113 Taken together, these studies show that extrafine-particle pressurized metered-dose inhalers might have additional clinical benefits in the treatment of asthma compared with coarse-particle treatment.…”
Section: Effect Of Asthma Treatment On Small-airways Function and Symsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[107][108][109][110][111][112][113] Extrafine-particle ICSs with an MMAD of approximately 1 mm have a higher lung deposition (50% to 60%) than coarse particle ICSs with an MMAD of 3 to 4 mm (10% to 20%). [114][115][116] Boulet et al 107 compared 3-month treatment with 320 mg of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-ciclesonide administered once daily with 200 mg of dry powder inhaler (DPI)-fluticasone administered twice daily in patients with asthma.…”
Section: Effect Of Asthma Treatment On Small-airways Function and Symmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] An advantage of small-particle instead of large-particle inhaled treatment could be a higher total lung deposition in addition to better deposition in the small airways. [4,5] Yet, we are currently not able to select asthma patients with small airway dysfunction, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prospective randomised controlled trials have shown greater improvements in small airway outcomes in response to extra-fine compared with coarse particle ICS formulations in unselected patient cohorts [8][9][10][11][12]. Other retrospective health informatics data comparing extra-fine and coarse particle ICS formulations have revealed consistent results in terms of improved asthma control based on prescribing outcomes, but have not measured any small airway pulmonary function outcomes [13][14][15]. We believe the time has now come for designing prospective randomised controlled trials enrolling patients with an enriched small airway phenotype, perhaps powered on pragmatic outcomes such as the Asthma Control Questionnaire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%