Presence & placement

Cross-Device Taxonomy

“…Both Informative → observational studies (e.g. interviews, diary study) [40-42, 75, 112, 148, 153, 252, 290] → gesture elicitation studies [166,230,271,305] Usage 219→ qualitative lab study [31,32,49,116,133,143,230,231,263,357] → quantitative user study [8,16,28,97,109,122,136,165,187,189,198,212,249,271,274,314,352,366] → mixed method lab study [7,54,190,191,206,255,264,302,352,367] → deployment in → social setting, conference [224,317,335] → classroom, students [37,53,…”

CollabAR – Investigating the Mediating Role of Mobile AR Interfaces on Co-Located Group Collaboration

“…This is reflected in recent technologies aimed at collaborative mobile experiences (such e.g. HuddleLamp [39] or Connichiwa [44]) but studies into more detailed device-handling, collaboration practices or sensemaking [7,22,37,40,51]. We build on these insights and findings and use them as a framework to study the collaborative aspects of AR in co-located settings.…”

Investigating the Role of an Overview Device in Multi-Device Collaboration

“…Previous research explored that an increased display size [1], multiple shared displays [33], and device ecologies [24] help a single user during sensemaking. Within collaborative situations, tabletops (e.g.…”

“…[2,6,21,22,45]) can mediate collaborative sensemaking activities. In particular, such setups can provide a shared display [6,33,45] and collaboration space [2,40], support spatial and visual organization of content [49], provide awareness [9,43], and support a shared understanding [22,45]. However, recent studies suggested that an increased size of a shared space is not indicative of improved collaborations, as participants' attention may be diverted towards the screen instead of other collaborators [49], and that users are hesitant to use multiple tablets in parallel, hinting at a "legacy bias" to use tablets as computers rather than documents [32].…”