The Challenge of Finding New Mineral Resources<subtitle>Global Metallogeny, Innovative Exploration, and New Discoveries&l 2010
DOI: 10.5382/sp.15.2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present and Future Geophysical Methods for Ni-Cu-PGE Exploration<subtitle>Lessons from McFaulds Lake, Northern Ontario</subtitle>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McFaulds Lake is the study area that is located in northwest Ontario, Canada. A highly magnetic ultramafic intrusion was emplaced within the Sachigo greenstone belt in the area known as the Ring of Fire (Balch, Mungall and Niemi ). The ultramafic intrusion is the host of Ni–Cu–PGE deposits in deeper parts and hosts chromite deposits in upper parts within magnetite and serpentine (Lin and Zhdanov ).…”
Section: Application To Field Magnetic Data Of Mcfaulds Lakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…McFaulds Lake is the study area that is located in northwest Ontario, Canada. A highly magnetic ultramafic intrusion was emplaced within the Sachigo greenstone belt in the area known as the Ring of Fire (Balch, Mungall and Niemi ). The ultramafic intrusion is the host of Ni–Cu–PGE deposits in deeper parts and hosts chromite deposits in upper parts within magnetite and serpentine (Lin and Zhdanov ).…”
Section: Application To Field Magnetic Data Of Mcfaulds Lakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study area is located within the central domain, where most of the known chromite deposits are located. Balch et al (2010) summarized a number of geophysical surveys from two Ni-Cu-PGE occurrences in the McFaulds Lake area. They present a qualitative interpretation of full gravity tensor data measured with the Bell Geospace system in the McFaulds area and conclude that tensor data provide an accurate outline of ultramafic units and iron formations.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected density contrast between ultramafic units and the lower density country rocks ranges from 0.1 to 0.4 g/cm 3 . A qualitative interpretation of aeromagnetic data is also presented by Balch et al (2010); no physical properties are given as the data were strictly used to map the geology. However, ultramafic rocks have high susceptibility and are expected to cause high amplitude magnetic anomalies similar to those observed in our data.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%