Context.-Cytology relies heavily on morphology to make diagnoses, and morphologic criteria have not changed much in recent years. The field is being shaped predominantly by new techniques for imaging and for acquiring and processing samples, advances in molecular diagnosis and therapeutics, and regulatory issues.Objective.-To review the importance of classical morphology in the future of cytopathology, to identify areas in which cytology is expanding or contracting in its scope, and to identify factors that are shaping the field.Data Sources.-Literature review.Conclusions.-Five stories paint a picture in which classical cytomorphology will continue to have essential importance, both for diagnosis and for improving our understanding of cancer biology. New endoscopy and imaging techniques are replacing surgical biopsies with cytology samples. New molecularly targeted therapies offer a chance for cytology to play a major role, but they pose new challenges. New molecular tests have the potential to synergize with, but not replace, morphologic interpretation of thyroid fine-needle aspirations. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration performed by cytopathologists is opening a new field of ''interventional cytopathology'' with unique value. For the productive evolution of the field, it will be important for cytopathologists to play an active role in clinical trials that document the ability of cytology to achieve cost-effective health care outcomes.(Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137:894-906; doi: 10.5858/ arpa.2012-0258-SA) THE CONTINUING VALUE OF CYTOMORPHOLOGY C ytopathologists have been primarily morphologists, using the smallest possible biopsy specimen for diagnosis. It is unusual for new diagnostic morphologic features to be discovered. A rare example is the description of intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions in at least a subset of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.1 The new Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology is certainly important, but the actual morphologic criteria for diagnosing thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) have scarcely changed in the past several decades. It seems that classical cytomorphology has brought the field about as far as it can go.Though new diagnostic cytomorphologies are not likely to help the productive evolution of cytology, the theme of this first story is that classical morphology will continue to have an essential value. In order to provide new useful clinical applications, cytopathology needs to be redefined as the field that uses the smallest possible biopsy specimen for diagnosis by using any technique. The full value of classical cytomorphology can be boosted by new technologies, including improvements in cell block techniques 2-4 and better microbiopsy needles. 5 The use of ultrasound guidance for cytopathologist-performed FNA and the development of new endoscopic techniques have provided new applications for classical cytomorphology. New immunofluorescent microscopy techniques are promising to synergize with classical cytomorphologic diagnosis...