Preservation of the Primary Teeth

Ireland, Ralph L.

doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1947.0097

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Twenty freshly extracted human primary molar teeth without root resorption yet (which was seen as Res i ) and 20 freshly extracted human primary molar teeth with root resorption (which was seen as Res 1/4 ) were selected by using the root resorption scale which was made by Moorrees, Fanning, and Hunt Jr (1963). Also, the teeth were measured with an endodontic measuring ruler (Dentsply, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) to determine the root resorption which was not more than the apical 1/3 of the root (Ireland & Kramer, 1959). The teeth with advanced root resorption and calcified, obliterated canals were excluded.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators, cone‐beam computed tomography, and radiovisiography in primary teeth: An in vitro study

Kayabasi

Öznurhan

2020

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic apex locators (EALs), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and radiovisiography (RVG) claim to determine of working length (WL) in primary molar teeth. To evaluate the accuracy of WL determination by using three EALs, RVG, and CBCT imaging in extracted human primary molar teeth with/without root resorption. Twenty extracted primary molar teeth with resorption and 20 extracted primary molar teeth without resorption were used. After measuring actual lengths (AL) (Group 1), the electronic WL measurements were performed by using three different EALs [COXO C Smart-1 Pro (Group 2), iPex (Group 3), and Apex ID (Group 4)]. Two different image sets were obtained as follows: CBCT imaging (Group 5) and RVG (Group 6). AL measurements performed with an endodontic measuring ruler and compared with the EAL, CBCT, and RVG image measurements. For all groups, there were no significant differences between the teeth with resorption and without. There were no significant differences in measuring methods from AL and between the methods used (p > .05). When electronic and radiographic method were compared in different frequency ranges, there was no statistically significant difference (p > .05). This study showed that EALs, CBCT, and RVG have high accuracy in primary molar teeth both with resorption and without root resorption and can be used for determining WL.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators, cone‐beam computed tomography, and radiovisiography in primary teeth: An in vitro study

Kayabasi

Öznurhan

2020

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the middle of the last century, it was determined that childhood is the most important period to start a program of preventive dentistry 9 . The currently proposed main preventive strategy focuses on the internalization of effective oral hygiene habits and requires the contribution of legal guardians at the time of establishing these habits 10–13 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of dental floss use in deciduous dentition: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Nascimento

Rodrigues

Manso

2022

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental caries in deciduous dentition affects approximately 530 million children worldwide 1 and is the main cause of tooth loss. 2 This pathology can have negative consequences in terms of diet, phonetics and aesthetics. 3 It is particularly critical because even after treatment, the affected dental structure continues to exhibit a greater vulnerability. 4 The first and second deciduous molars are more frequently affected by dental caries than the anterior teeth. 5 This is probably due to their anatomical and morphological configurations along with the areas of flat interproximal contact. 6 As interdental plaque forms more quickly 7 and is more acidogenic and prevalent, 8 it also makes an important contribution to this condition.In the middle of the last century, it was determined that childhood is the most important period to start a program of preventive dentistry. 9

show abstract

Preservation of the Primary Teeth

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators, cone‐beam computed tomography, and radiovisiography in primary teeth: An in vitro study

Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators, cone‐beam computed tomography, and radiovisiography in primary teeth: An in vitro study

Prevalence of dental floss use in deciduous dentition: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About