2020
DOI: 10.1306/05212019052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure coring a Gulf of Mexico deep-water turbidite gas hydrate reservoir: Initial results from The University of Texas–Gulf of Mexico 2-1 (UT-GOM2-1) Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We set a constant seafloor temperature of 4°C and a constant basal heat flux of 50 mW/m 2 . This simulates a BHSZ at 460 mbsf at the ridge, close to the observation of 468 mbsf at GC 955 (Flemings et al., 2020). There is no flux of heat and fluid across the lateral sides of the domain.…”
Section: Testing the Conceptual Model With 2d Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We set a constant seafloor temperature of 4°C and a constant basal heat flux of 50 mW/m 2 . This simulates a BHSZ at 460 mbsf at the ridge, close to the observation of 468 mbsf at GC 955 (Flemings et al., 2020). There is no flux of heat and fluid across the lateral sides of the domain.…”
Section: Testing the Conceptual Model With 2d Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…
Figure 1 CT scan images of pressure cores at different times and scales. Figure ( a ) is a sectional view of a portion of core H005 5FB-3 scanned on board soon after the drilling of the pressure core, May 2017 29 ; figure ( b ) is a sectional view of the same pressure core scanned with the industrial CT scanner (the remaining segments of the 30-cm long pressure core after three cuts), Dec 2019; figure ( c ) is an overview of the mini-core (Sample #3, Feb 03, 2020) drilled from the left-hand portion of the core shown in ( b ); figure ( d ) is high-resolution image of the portion of Sample #3 (noted as D on c : Jan 31-Feb 03, 2020); figure ( e ) is high-resolution image of the portion of Sample #3 (noted as E on c : Feb 03–05, 2020); and figure ( f ) is high-resolution image of the portion of Sample #3 (noted as F on c : Feb 05–07, 2020). Scales in ( a ) and ( b ) are provided by the ruler; ( d ), ( e ), and ( f ) share the same scale bar; ( d ), ( e ), and ( f ) show raw CT images on the right and the same image with hydrate false-colored in blue.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposit is composed of interbedded sandy silt and clayey silt layers 57 . The hydrate saturation in sandy silts at this site ranges from 79 to 93% as determined by collecting the amount of gas during pressure core degassing and the pore water salinity is close to the seawater concentration 29 , 58 . Additional information about the pressure core such as the drilling process can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations