2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.045322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of Cu, Ag, andFe/nGaAsSchottky barrier heights

Abstract: The Schottky barrier height of intimate Cu/GaAs ͑110͒, Ag/GaAs ͑110͒, and Fe/GaAs ͑100͒ has been measured as a function of hydrostatic pressure. The pressure dependence of the Cu and Ag/n-GaAs barrier heights of 97Ϯ4 meV/GPa fall within the uncertainty of the pressure dependence of the As Ga defect and track the predicted value of As Ga -rich interfaces. In contrast, the pressure dependence of the Fe/n-GaAs(100) Schottky barrier height of 109Ϯ7 meV/GPa does not fall within experimental error of these values an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculations suggest that at the defect-free interface, the Fermi level is pinned by Fe minority-spin interface states, supporting the metal-induced gap states (MIGS) model 32,33 rather than the semiconductor surface state model. 21 This also agrees with recent experiments on the pressure dependence of metal/GaAs Schottky barrier heights, 26 which support the MIGS model for atomically clean Fe/GaAs interfaces. A notable difference between the interface states we find and MIGS suggested in the original works 32,33 is that the interface states in our case are localized at the interface and are not derived from the metal bulk states.…”
Section: Spin-polarization and Interface Statessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our calculations suggest that at the defect-free interface, the Fermi level is pinned by Fe minority-spin interface states, supporting the metal-induced gap states (MIGS) model 32,33 rather than the semiconductor surface state model. 21 This also agrees with recent experiments on the pressure dependence of metal/GaAs Schottky barrier heights, 26 which support the MIGS model for atomically clean Fe/GaAs interfaces. A notable difference between the interface states we find and MIGS suggested in the original works 32,33 is that the interface states in our case are localized at the interface and are not derived from the metal bulk states.…”
Section: Spin-polarization and Interface Statessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[34] [Eqs. (14) and (40) for forward and reverse bias conditions, respectively]. However, for the present case of a heavily doped interlayer, the obtained diode parameters have to be regarded as rough estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger Schottky barrier height of the HT-Fe 3 Si contacts most likely originates from atomic exchange reactions at the FM/SC interface which are promoted by higher growth temperatures, especially for Fe containing FM films [36][37][38]. Selective exchange reactions, in particular, influence the GaAs stoichiometry at the interface proximity and, thus, the density of electronic gap states which are responsible for Fermi level pinning and the Schottky barrier formation [39,40]. Furthermore, the degree of electrical compensation resulting from the incorporation of Fe impurities and the temperature-dependent formation of Fe precipitates in the GaAs lattice might play an important role for the Fermi level pinning and the resulting Schottky barrier height [41][42][43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies conclude that by the effect of pressure is possible to modify the electronic structure of δ -doped quantum wells. Besides, there are experimental reports and an analytical expression that takes into account the effect of hydrostatic pressure on the height of the Schottky barrier [7,8,9]. These two elements, δ -doped well and Schottky barrier, are the building blocks of δ -doped Field Effect Transistors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%