1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.43.13714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of the superconducting phases inUPt3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
58
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
58
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to compare these predictions with the threee-dimensional phase diagram of Boukhny et al [44] quantitatively. The pressure dependence of the critical temperatures given by these authors is not in good agreement with that of Trappmann et al [41], which we used in plotting the figures. The behavior of the boundaries is quite sensitive to this dependence.…”
Section: Pressure Effectscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is difficult to compare these predictions with the threee-dimensional phase diagram of Boukhny et al [44] quantitatively. The pressure dependence of the critical temperatures given by these authors is not in good agreement with that of Trappmann et al [41], which we used in plotting the figures. The behavior of the boundaries is quite sensitive to this dependence.…”
Section: Pressure Effectscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…For P > P N , M = 0 and the pressure dependence of T c is entirely due to the coefficient α SP . Since dT c /dP = −11 mK/kbar in this region [41], we find α SP = α ST (11 mK/kbar). At P = 0 and T < T c1 , there is a competition between the purely magnetic terms and the coupling term f SM .…”
Section: Pressure Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two superconducting transitions are reminiscent of the only other stoichiometric metal exhibiting this type of behaviour, UPt 3 , which displays a complex superconducting phase diagram as a function of magnetic field [13] and pressure [14]. We find that the double transition in PrOs 4 Sb 12 may no longer be resolved in 0.5 T, making more measurements necessary to establish the fate of the double transition in magnetic field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, we have measured the specific heat and electrical resistivity at the superconducting for the SMAF as the symmetry breaking field has been obtained by neutron-diffraction [25] and specific-heat [36] experiments under pressure. It was found that both m 2 and ∆T c are suppressed quasi-linearly with pressure and vanish at a critical pressure p c~ 0.35 GPa.…”
Section: Interplay Of Magnetism and Superconductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%