1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00441833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure distribution in the knee joint

Abstract: Biomechanical factors influencing the patterns of pressure distribution at the articular surface and the subchondral bone are suggested to be most important in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and osteochondritis dissecans at the knee joint. Besides this, chronic joint instability is another important factor under discussion in the etiology of osteoarthritis of the knee. The patterns of pressure distribution on the femoral condyles of weight-bearing knee joints were investigated in a biostatic cadaver model.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12,16,22,28 In our goat model, pressures on the MFC in knees without defect were 10.7% greater at full extension than pressures on the LFC. This percentage increase was lesser in magnitude when compared with the results by Bruns et al 4 in their human cadaveric model, who noted that pressure in the MFC in a neutral position was 26.9% greater than that on the LFC. This difference can be attributed to a decrease in articular congruity between condyles in the goat model because of its fused fibula, convex lateral tibial plateau, and condylar and compartmental joint geometry and from the effects of dynamic loading.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…12,16,22,28 In our goat model, pressures on the MFC in knees without defect were 10.7% greater at full extension than pressures on the LFC. This percentage increase was lesser in magnitude when compared with the results by Bruns et al 4 in their human cadaveric model, who noted that pressure in the MFC in a neutral position was 26.9% greater than that on the LFC. This difference can be attributed to a decrease in articular congruity between condyles in the goat model because of its fused fibula, convex lateral tibial plateau, and condylar and compartmental joint geometry and from the effects of dynamic loading.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Thirdly, we tested the valgus laxity only in extension. Although the MCL is the primary static stabiliser against valgus rotation of the knee, in extension the posterior medial capsule seems to be an important structure and in flexion it is the superficial MCL [3, 14]. Nevertheless, in extension, we found a significant increase in valgus laxity after release of the superficial MCL, so, in flexion, the valgus laxity is expected to be more pronounced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Joints were opened using aseptic technique, and one osteochondral explant was harvested from the anterior region of each distal femoral medial condyle [19]. This location was chosen for consistent harvest of samples from loadbearing regions of the joint [19][20][21], enabling the study of articular cartilage at locations more susceptible to accelerated wear in hemiarthroplasties. In addition, because this region of the stifle joint is characterized by high levels of SZP expression [19,22], it facilitates the quantification of protein loss due to mechanical wear.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%