2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.07.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure drop and flow distribution in multiple parallel-channel configurations used in proton-exchange membrane fuel cell stacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereby it becomes an utmost necessity to properly understand the flow maldistribution behavior in such systems since grossly non-uniform cooling can lead to failure of certain regions of the source device. The extent of flow maldistribution in macro and minichannels are well understood from the several proposed models [6][7][8] however such models fail to predict maldistribution of flow in parallel microchannels [9] since such models either neglect frictional effects within channels or the inertial effects in the manifold while both effects are equally important in case of parallel microchannels [9]. There are several experimental and numerical reports that attempt to understand flow distribution of single phase flows in parallel microchannels [10][11][12][13], for both adiabatic and heat transfer cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby it becomes an utmost necessity to properly understand the flow maldistribution behavior in such systems since grossly non-uniform cooling can lead to failure of certain regions of the source device. The extent of flow maldistribution in macro and minichannels are well understood from the several proposed models [6][7][8] however such models fail to predict maldistribution of flow in parallel microchannels [9] since such models either neglect frictional effects within channels or the inertial effects in the manifold while both effects are equally important in case of parallel microchannels [9]. There are several experimental and numerical reports that attempt to understand flow distribution of single phase flows in parallel microchannels [10][11][12][13], for both adiabatic and heat transfer cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet such high thermal demands, the design of microchannel cooling system has undergone several alterations and modifications in the past decades. The extent of maldistribution of the working fluid in macro and mini channel systems is well understood from the available models [2][3][4]. On the contrary, the trend of maldistribution in case of microchannels is different and such models are futile for prediction of maldistribution of fluid in parallel microchannels [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the liquid water keeps the membrane hydrated, but it also blocks the GDL passage, reduces the diffusion rate and the effective reacting surface area. The water formation and transport of liquid water is modelled by using a saturation model based on [20,21]. In this approach, the liquid water formation and transport is governed by the conservation equation for the volume fraction of liquid water, s, or the water saturation [22]: (12) where the subscript represents liquid water, and is the condensation rate modelled as: (13) where is added to the water vapor equation as well as the pressure correction (mass source).…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%