1948
DOI: 10.1177/000271624825900104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Groups Versus Political Parties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest groups have long featured in accounts of the democratic infrastructure of contemporary Western political systems (see for instance Key ; Schattschneider ; for a recent discussion see Hacker and Pierson ). Classic discussions of political responsiveness, especially in majoritarian systems, pencil in important roles for groups in ensuring that minority views are voiced adequately.…”
Section: Revisiting the Role Of Groups As Democratizing Agents: Genermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interest groups have long featured in accounts of the democratic infrastructure of contemporary Western political systems (see for instance Key ; Schattschneider ; for a recent discussion see Hacker and Pierson ). Classic discussions of political responsiveness, especially in majoritarian systems, pencil in important roles for groups in ensuring that minority views are voiced adequately.…”
Section: Revisiting the Role Of Groups As Democratizing Agents: Genermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest groups have long featured in accounts of the democratic infrastructure of contemporary Western political systems (see for instance Key 1942;Schattschneider 1948; for a recent discussion see Hacker and Pierson 2014).…”
Section: Revisiting the Role Of Groups As Democratizing Agents: Genmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a program meant that organized special interests, rather than parties, determine the government's agenda, leading to incoherence in policy and a lack of responsiveness to the majority. 17 Schattschneider was for the most part thinking in aggregate terms about competition between party and interest group systems over the control of the political agenda and policy, but he also noted that individual organized interests and parties sometimes directly compete for resources. He made this observation when he was critical of even seemingly public-spirited good government or public interest groups because these organized interests ''compete with the political parties for the services of the best citizens in the community. ''…”
Section: Conflict and Cooperation Between Parties And Organized Intermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He made this observation when he was critical of even seemingly public-spirited good government or public interest groups because these organized interests ''compete with the political parties for the services of the best citizens in the community. '' 18 Although little research has been done on this type of competition, Richardson argues that parties and interest groups compete for the resources of political activists in Europe and finds that countries with large interest group membership increases have seen the steepest declines in party membership. 19 Parties and organized interests might also compete for the loyalties of political elites like office-seekers because both parties and interests provide many of the same campaign services like polling and mobilizing voters.…”
Section: Conflict and Cooperation Between Parties And Organized Intermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation