2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/215/1/012005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure-induced irreversible isosymmetric transition ofTSb3(T=Co, Rh and Ir)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since appreciable dislocation formation in CoSb 3 crystallites is not likely above 0.3 Td ( Td : peritectic decomposition T ) and the Td of CoSb 3 is 876 °C, few crystallite‐strain‐dominating dislocations are produced in the HT‐processed sample, while they are replete in the RT‐processed sample. The observed lattice‐parameter expansion and CoSb 2 formation are due to antimony self‐insertion, as previously reported4951 and the subsequent collapse of the CoSb 3 phase under Giga‐Pascal pressures. As above, the effect is more pronounced in the RT‐processed sample as compared to the HT‐processed sample as (1) the strain energy (attendant with dislocations) is higher in the RT sample; and (2) Sb de‐insertion occurs at temperatures greater than 180 °C (at ambient pressure) as reported by Miotto et al50 Hence Sb de‐insertion, nucleation, and growth occur upon cooling the HT sample from 400 °C to room temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Since appreciable dislocation formation in CoSb 3 crystallites is not likely above 0.3 Td ( Td : peritectic decomposition T ) and the Td of CoSb 3 is 876 °C, few crystallite‐strain‐dominating dislocations are produced in the HT‐processed sample, while they are replete in the RT‐processed sample. The observed lattice‐parameter expansion and CoSb 2 formation are due to antimony self‐insertion, as previously reported4951 and the subsequent collapse of the CoSb 3 phase under Giga‐Pascal pressures. As above, the effect is more pronounced in the RT‐processed sample as compared to the HT‐processed sample as (1) the strain energy (attendant with dislocations) is higher in the RT sample; and (2) Sb de‐insertion occurs at temperatures greater than 180 °C (at ambient pressure) as reported by Miotto et al50 Hence Sb de‐insertion, nucleation, and growth occur upon cooling the HT sample from 400 °C to room temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, in experiments conducted with CoSb 3 (and related compounds) at high pressure and room temperature, Sb x CoSb 3Àx is observed with no apparent contamination from CoSb 2 . 10, 13 As we shall see, Bragg peaks from free Sb formed by decomposition of CoSb 3 will be identified in the x-ray powder diffraction pattern of samples previously rich in Sb x CoSb 3Àx , after heating to temperatures high enough to promote the desinsertion reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Also, further evidence of this transition has been provided by Matsui et al in a recent study of the pressure behavior of TSb 3 (T ¼ Co, Rh, and Ir). 13 In this work, samples of Sb x CoSb 3Àx were produced at high pressure and high temperature aiming to obtain further insight on the nature of the guest atom. Also, the change with temperature of the crystallographic site occupied by the atoms that collapses into the skutterudite cages was explored by means of model-independent charge density maps derived from synchrotron radiation x-ray powder diffraction data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have verified this phenomenon of CoSb 3 by synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction. 13) If the self-insertion reaction scenario is plausible, a marked rattling effect of the inserted Sb ions to site 2a, which is located inside a distorted cage, is expected.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%