2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and clinical significance of totally occluded infarct-related arteries in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall long-term mortality was low and did not differ between study groups. A similar result, albeit based on much shorter follow-up, was recently reported based on registry analyses 35 . Nevertheless, not surprisingly, patients with pre-PPCI TIMI flow grade 3 showed a strong trend towards better survival which demonstrated the clinical difference between NSTEMI and a complete coronary flow restoration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The overall long-term mortality was low and did not differ between study groups. A similar result, albeit based on much shorter follow-up, was recently reported based on registry analyses 35 . Nevertheless, not surprisingly, patients with pre-PPCI TIMI flow grade 3 showed a strong trend towards better survival which demonstrated the clinical difference between NSTEMI and a complete coronary flow restoration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Single-vessel disease was defined as at least 50% stenosis in one major coronary artery [ 23 ]. Multivessel disease was defined as at least two major vessels (≥ 2 mm diameter) from different territories with lesions deemed angiographically significant (≥ 50% stenosis) [ 4 , 24 ]. A 50% or more reduction in the internal diameter of the left main coronary artery was considered to be three-vessel disease [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been concern that a significant portion of patients not presenting with STEMI ECGs show an acute coronary occlusion in coronary angiography [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. A recent study compared STEMI ECGs and non-STEMI ECGs for patients with acute coronary occlusion on coronary angiography and found that ED arrival to catheterization time is significantly delayed in patients with non-STEMI ECGs, while adverse outcomes are similar between the two groups [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%