1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00071-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and growth of Listeria monocytogenes in naturally contaminated seafood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
106
1
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
106
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with published literature; Jørgensen and Huss (1998) found that L. monocytogenes prevalence was highest in cold smoked fish (34-60 %), and lowest in heat-treated seafood, including hot smoked fish (4-12 %). Although processing temperatures used in the smoked fish industry can vary, the higher temperatures applied during the hot smoking process could at least partially explain the lower odds of L. monocytogenes contamination in ‗Hot smoked fish' compared with ‗Cold smoked fish'.…”
Section: 11supporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with published literature; Jørgensen and Huss (1998) found that L. monocytogenes prevalence was highest in cold smoked fish (34-60 %), and lowest in heat-treated seafood, including hot smoked fish (4-12 %). Although processing temperatures used in the smoked fish industry can vary, the higher temperatures applied during the hot smoking process could at least partially explain the lower odds of L. monocytogenes contamination in ‗Hot smoked fish' compared with ‗Cold smoked fish'.…”
Section: 11supporting
confidence: 93%
“…in Morocco [3] , in Spain [4] , in Vietnam [5] , in India [6] ; L. monocytogenes in Spain [7] , in USA [8] , in India [9] , in Denmark [10] , in Iran [11] . In Turkey the prevalence of these pathogens has not been extensively investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Berjia et al (2012), the initial concentrations of L. monocytogenes in cold smoked salmon are {0.5, 1.5, 2.5} log cfu/g with prevalences {0.28, 0.05, 0.01} (Jørgensen and Huss 1998). These initial concentrations C0 were modified to better describe the variability in the model and are now defined by a Normal distribution with mean=1.2189 log cfu/g and SD= 0.8.…”
Section: Listeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These initial concentrations C0 were modified to better describe the variability in the model and are now defined by a Normal distribution with mean=1.2189 log cfu/g and SD= 0.8. Here, the mean was calculated by adding the products of the indicated initial concentrations and their respective prevalences, (Jørgensen and Huss 1998). The value of standard deviation (SD) = 0.8 log10 units was chosen based on ILSI (2010), where it is suggested to use this value as a default value to describe the standard deviation of a batch, when no better data or more specific information on a batch is available.…”
Section: Listeriamentioning
confidence: 99%