2008
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.7.632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Humanistic Impact of Potential Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder in a Commercially Insured Population

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Patients with bipolar disorder typically present to physicians in the depressed rather than the manic or hypomanic phase of illness. Because the depressive episodes in bipolar disorder may be indistinguishable from those in major depressive disorder (MDD), misdiagnosis may occur.OBJECTIVES: To estimate from administrative claims data and a telephone survey the prevalence of potential misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder among patients with MDD and the humanistic (health-related quality of life [HRQOL] … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to BDs, low insight (Dias et al, 2008) and frequent misdiagnosis with MDD in depressive phases (Kamat et al, 2008) might be hypothesized as important factors influencing the DUI. Bipolar patients with a depressive onset of illness and predominant depressive course have been shown to remain symptomatic up to 10 years before receiving a correct diagnosis and correct pharmacological treatment (Rosa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to BDs, low insight (Dias et al, 2008) and frequent misdiagnosis with MDD in depressive phases (Kamat et al, 2008) might be hypothesized as important factors influencing the DUI. Bipolar patients with a depressive onset of illness and predominant depressive course have been shown to remain symptomatic up to 10 years before receiving a correct diagnosis and correct pharmacological treatment (Rosa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kamat et al. (48) used the MDQ to screen for BD in 1360 patients with major depressive disorder and found a positive screen rate of 7%. Throughout most of the article, they were careful to use correct terminology, noting a positive MDQ screen as opposed to a BD diagnosis, although in one instance in the conclusion, they wrote inappropriately that the ‘bipolar disorder misdiagnosis rate was 7%.’ More concerning than that (given that the error was only a single instance), they reviewed the burden associated with an MDQ‐positive screen and never entertained the possibility that this burden might have been due to other disorders (such as borderline personality disorder) as opposed to BD.…”
Section: Inappropriate Conclusion and Inferences From Studies Using mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying molecular basis of the two mood disorders remains largely obscure. Moreover, diagnosis of MDD and BD currently relies on evaluation of symptoms and a clinical interview, which leads to high rates of misdiagnosis . Differential diagnosis of depressive episodes of BD and MDD is of great importance, since the pharmacotherapeutic strategies for relieving depressive symptoms in these two disorders are substantially different .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%