2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-019-06249-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis miescheriana and Sarcocystis suihominis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…aretiecanis 95.8–96.3 KU820984 ; MK420017 ( Hu et al, 2016 ; Gjerde et al, 2020 ) Sarcocystis sp. MT737952 Fox 16 Fox16 PCR 639 S. miescheriana 100 MH404232 Gazzonis et al (2019) S. miescheriana MT737934 Fox16 clone1-Fox16 clone8 664 S. miescheriana 99.9–100 MH404232 Gazzonis et al (2019) S. miescheriana MW020901- MW020903 Fox 46 Fox46 PCR 617 S. hjorti 100 GQ250990 Dahlgren and Gjerde (2010a) S. hjorti MT737935 Fox 47 Fox47 PCR 638 S. gracilis 100 MN334289 Rudaitytė-Lukošienė et al (2020) S. gracilis MT737936 Fox47 clone1-Fox47 clone4 675 S. gracilis 99.7–100 MN334289 Rudaitytė-Lukošienė et al (2020) S. gracilis MW020904- MW020907 Fox47 clone5 647 S. tenella …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aretiecanis 95.8–96.3 KU820984 ; MK420017 ( Hu et al, 2016 ; Gjerde et al, 2020 ) Sarcocystis sp. MT737952 Fox 16 Fox16 PCR 639 S. miescheriana 100 MH404232 Gazzonis et al (2019) S. miescheriana MT737934 Fox16 clone1-Fox16 clone8 664 S. miescheriana 99.9–100 MH404232 Gazzonis et al (2019) S. miescheriana MW020901- MW020903 Fox 46 Fox46 PCR 617 S. hjorti 100 GQ250990 Dahlgren and Gjerde (2010a) S. hjorti MT737935 Fox 47 Fox47 PCR 638 S. gracilis 100 MN334289 Rudaitytė-Lukošienė et al (2020) S. gracilis MT737936 Fox47 clone1-Fox47 clone4 675 S. gracilis 99.7–100 MN334289 Rudaitytė-Lukošienė et al (2020) S. gracilis MW020904- MW020907 Fox47 clone5 647 S. tenella …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcocystis spp. isolated from C. dromedarius from Dammam and Riyadh grouped alongside S. levinei hosted by B. bubalis (heart tissue) in India (accession numbers MH255774-MH255777) [42], S. rangi hosted by R. tarandus in Norway (accession numbers KC209662-KC209666) [43], S. miescheriana hosted by S. scrofa in Italy (accession number MH404202) [44], and S. fayeri hosted by E. caballus in Canada (accession number LC171854) [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, serological studies on the spread of N. caninum were also conducted in European wild boars' populations (Almería et al 2007;Bártová et al 2006;Reiterová et al 2016). Considering that wild boar populations are nowadays in expansion in terms both of the number of animals and habitat range, the increased frequency of contacts among wild boars, livestock, and humans could influence the transmission of zoonotic and animal-specific pathogens, as previously demonstrated in this area for other similar protozoa infections (Gazzonis et al 2018b(Gazzonis et al , 2019a. In the same study area, a recent molecular survey reporting the presence of N. caninum in brain tissue of wild birds of prey not only suggests the involvement of avian species in the parasite life cycle but also the environmental circulation of Neospora, indicating a possible role of these wild populations in the epidemiology of the parasite infection at the interface of the domestic and sylvatic life cycle (Gazzonis et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%