2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and molecular characterization of Hepatozoon canis in dogs from urban and rural areas in Southeast Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hepatozoon canis has been detected in dogs in several regions in Brazil, with frequencies ranging from 0.48% (1/205) (RAMOS et al, 2010) to 75.9% (161/212) (MIRANDA et al, 2014) in dogs from urban areas of Recife and Uberlândia, respectively. In a single survey conducted in Campo Grande, a Hepatozoon spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hepatozoon canis has been detected in dogs in several regions in Brazil, with frequencies ranging from 0.48% (1/205) (RAMOS et al, 2010) to 75.9% (161/212) (MIRANDA et al, 2014) in dogs from urban areas of Recife and Uberlândia, respectively. In a single survey conducted in Campo Grande, a Hepatozoon spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the methodology used in the present study (PCR) is more sensitive than optical microscopy, and the current sampling has been performed in sick dogs, in which a higher frequency of infected animals would be expected, no relevant difference was observed with respect to the previous study (SALGADO, 2006). On the other hand, a comparative analysis of data from different regions of Brazil revealed significant differences in H. canis infection rates in urban areas (RAMOS et al, 2010;PEREIRA et al, 2011;MIRANDA et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…could be due to many factors including the distribution and population density of the vector (Otranto et al 2011), the sampling methodology and the characteristics of the targeted dog population (Gomes et al 2010;De Miranda et al 2014). An analysis of risk factors indicated that male dogs were more often infected with E. canis than the females, but this association was statistically non-significant (P = 0.15) confirming previous studies reporting that there is no correlation between the sex and the presence of E. canis infection in dogs (Rani et al 2011;Aktas et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%