2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai – A prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first screening done by DPOAE had a referral rate of 204(21.4%). This is comparable to the study done in Chennai by Vignesh et al 10 The referral rate of DPOAE can vary from 11-31% as reported by Barker et al is comparable to our study. 11 This variation could be because of criteria applied for pass/ refer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The first screening done by DPOAE had a referral rate of 204(21.4%). This is comparable to the study done in Chennai by Vignesh et al 10 The referral rate of DPOAE can vary from 11-31% as reported by Barker et al is comparable to our study. 11 This variation could be because of criteria applied for pass/ refer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The prevalence of congenital hearing loss in other studies were reported as 1 to 6 per 1000 screened babies, including both highrisk and well babies. 7,[17][18][19][20] The prevalence of congenital hearing loss in present study is much higher when compared to the other studies. In other studies, the study population was larger and also included a greater number of well babies than high-risk babies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Referral rates in high risk babies were more than well born babies in both DPOAE and AABR testing as observed in other studies. Estimated prevalence of congenital hearing loss in this current population is 1.42 per 1000 babies (9). Approximately 55% of neonates in the o the neonatal intensive care unit had risk factors related to permanent hearing loss (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Two tests have been widely used for infant screening: click or transient evoked autoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR). Both of these methods show high pass rates in newborn subjects (2,7,9). The report states that in India protocol used in 1st and 2nd stage of hearing screening are Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) alone and AABR are used in 3rd stage of hearing screening (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%