2020
DOI: 10.5455/mjhs.2020.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic neuropathy in Qassim, Saudi Arabia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in another cross-sectional study carried out in Saudi Arabia in 2014, which included 552 patients with diabetes, insulin use was found to be associated with DN [ 21 ]. Another cross-sectional study carried out in Qassim, Saudi Arabia in 2020 on 374 patients with diabetes showed that a multi-drug approach and insulin use, in particular, was associated with a high risk of developing DN [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in another cross-sectional study carried out in Saudi Arabia in 2014, which included 552 patients with diabetes, insulin use was found to be associated with DN [ 21 ]. Another cross-sectional study carried out in Qassim, Saudi Arabia in 2020 on 374 patients with diabetes showed that a multi-drug approach and insulin use, in particular, was associated with a high risk of developing DN [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) was used to evaluate DN in DM patients in the second and third sections of the questionnaire. The Arabic version of the MNSI was used and a total score of four or more was considered abnormal [10][11][12]. MNSI questions on medical history had to be answered with a 'Yes' or a 'No'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The screening of titles and abstracts based on the exclusion criteria resulted in the removal of 123 articles Finally, 11 crosssectional studies [8,24,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] and 1 prospective study [40]. were assessed for their quantitative analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Study Identification and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a detailed evaluation, 23 articles were excluded due to a lack of usable data and other reasons (Figure 1). Finally, 11 cross-sectional studies 8,24,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and 1 prospective study 40 were assessed for their quantitative analysis (Figure 1). Three additional studies [41][42][43] were removed due to their retrospective design.…”
Section: Study Identi Cation and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%