2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731118003403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of an inflammation and necrosis syndrome in suckling piglets

Abstract: The current study describes the results obtained from clinical examination of over 4700 suckling piglets from 19 individual herds in Germany. In this cohort the prevalence of inflammation and necrosis in the tails, ears, claw coronary bands, heels and teats was determined using a pre-defined scoring system. Results show that already in the 1st days of life, piglets were affected by inflammation and necrosis of the heels (80%), claw coronary bands (50%) and tail base (20%). The praevalences of these alterations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
31
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Inflammation and necrosis were clinically assessed as described by Reiner et al [ 51 ]. Due to time constraints and to minimize the animal load, clinical signs were recorded using a digital camera (Lumix, Panasonic Corporation) according to a standardized scheme for later detailed evaluation of the images (Windows Media Player, Version 12, Microsoft GmbH, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Inflammation and necrosis were clinically assessed as described by Reiner et al [ 51 ]. Due to time constraints and to minimize the animal load, clinical signs were recorded using a digital camera (Lumix, Panasonic Corporation) according to a standardized scheme for later detailed evaluation of the images (Windows Media Player, Version 12, Microsoft GmbH, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tail base and tip, ears, teats and navel, coronary bands, wall horn, balls and soles of the feet along with the face were all initially assessed individually. However, the scoring was more detailed than in Reiner et al [ 51 ]. The following clinical characteristics were considered and scored with 0 if the sign was not visible or 1 if the sign was visible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations