2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Arcobacter: From farm to retail – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its occurrence is higher in this by-product than what has been reported for retail beef meat in Asian and European countries (Kabeya et al 2004;Scullion et al 2006;De Smet et al 2010;Shah et al 2012;Zacharow et al 2015;Jasim et al 2020). This is an emerging pathogen that has been linked to both gastrointestinal and systemic diseases in humans and whose routes of transmission are still not entirely clear (Mateus et al 2021). As such, beef liver should also be considered in future epidemiological studies on Arcobacter transmission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its occurrence is higher in this by-product than what has been reported for retail beef meat in Asian and European countries (Kabeya et al 2004;Scullion et al 2006;De Smet et al 2010;Shah et al 2012;Zacharow et al 2015;Jasim et al 2020). This is an emerging pathogen that has been linked to both gastrointestinal and systemic diseases in humans and whose routes of transmission are still not entirely clear (Mateus et al 2021). As such, beef liver should also be considered in future epidemiological studies on Arcobacter transmission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The transmission of these zoonotic agents may occur through the consumption of contaminated water and foods (especially undercooked meats and unpasteurized milk), or through direct contact with carrier animals such as poultry and livestock, as well as pets (Kaakoush et al 2015;Mateus et al 2021). The intestinal tract of cattle usually harbours Campylobacter and Arcobacter species (Shah et al 2012;An et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of molecular methods allows a faster and more sensitive detection of bacteria, being able to detect both viable and non-viable cells, as well as viable but not cultivable cells. Nonetheless, this methodology has some drawbacks as well, associated with the fact that some molecular methodologies do not allow to distinguish dead from live cells or to recover bacterial isolates that can be used for further studies [14,[23][24][25]. Several culture methods are used and the recovery of bacteria from this family can be associated with various factors related with the sample, but also with the disparity in the sensitivity and specificity of isolation methods [25], pointing out the need for a standard protocol for the isolation of Arcobacteraceae species from diverse samples [11,23,25].…”
Section: Subgroup Analysis By Parameters Of Samples Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this methodology has some drawbacks as well, associated with the fact that some molecular methodologies do not allow to distinguish dead from live cells or to recover bacterial isolates that can be used for further studies [14,[23][24][25]. Several culture methods are used and the recovery of bacteria from this family can be associated with various factors related with the sample, but also with the disparity in the sensitivity and specificity of isolation methods [25], pointing out the need for a standard protocol for the isolation of Arcobacteraceae species from diverse samples [11,23,25]. Also, the use of a selective supplements may lead to lower recovery rates in environmental water samples, due to stressed or injured cells, which may be affected by using these compounds leading to a reduced recovery rate [25,26].…”
Section: Subgroup Analysis By Parameters Of Samples Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%