2006
DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v39.i4.p147-150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of hypodontia in Chinese orthodontic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the least affected teeth were maxillary central incisor, mandibular canines, and maxillary and mandibular first and second permanent molars (Figure 1). While some studies reported that the mandibular second premolars were most commonly missing teeth [15,20,28,30,31], others showed that maxillary lateral incisor was the most prevalence missing tooth in individuals with agenesis of only one or two teeth [7,10,14,21,22]. The most affected teeth in this study were maxillary lateral incisors, followed by maxillary and mandibular third molars, and mandibular second premolars.…”
Section: Open Access Http://scidocorg/ijdosphpmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, the least affected teeth were maxillary central incisor, mandibular canines, and maxillary and mandibular first and second permanent molars (Figure 1). While some studies reported that the mandibular second premolars were most commonly missing teeth [15,20,28,30,31], others showed that maxillary lateral incisor was the most prevalence missing tooth in individuals with agenesis of only one or two teeth [7,10,14,21,22]. The most affected teeth in this study were maxillary lateral incisors, followed by maxillary and mandibular third molars, and mandibular second premolars.…”
Section: Open Access Http://scidocorg/ijdosphpmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…It is however higher than previously reported range of 0 -3.6% in Nigerians [24][25][26]. Also, several reports from different racial populations reported prevalence of CMT ranging from 2.7% to 4.19% [13,14,16,20,21]. These differences could be due to variation in sampling techniques, methods of examination, as well as sex, age distribution and racial origin of the different sample populations.…”
Section: Open Access Http://scidocorg/ijdosphpmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations