2012
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2011.0955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence ofClostridium difficileToxin Genes in the Feces of Veal Calves and Incidence of Ground Veal Contamination

Abstract: A study was conducted in two parts to determine the prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in veal calves and retail meat. The first part of the study focused on the veal production continuum (farm to abattoir). Fifty calves from 4 veal herds (n=200) were followed for 18-22 weeks from the time of arrival on the veal farm to the time of slaughter. Fecal samples were collected from calves every 4-6 weeks. Half of the calves included in the study (n=100) were followed to the abattoir where carcass swabs we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
42
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…RT014 is the most common RT infecting humans in Australia (31) and in many countries in Europe, where it is also a leading cause of disease in the community (15). RT014 previously has been found in very small numbers in older cattle in Belgium (36) and in horses, domestic pets, and livestock in the Netherlands (37) and in retail meat in North America (38). The prevalence of RT014 reported in our study was higher than those of these earlier studies, 23.4% versus 1 to 2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT014 is the most common RT infecting humans in Australia (31) and in many countries in Europe, where it is also a leading cause of disease in the community (15). RT014 previously has been found in very small numbers in older cattle in Belgium (36) and in horses, domestic pets, and livestock in the Netherlands (37) and in retail meat in North America (38). The prevalence of RT014 reported in our study was higher than those of these earlier studies, 23.4% versus 1 to 2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Belgium, the observed prevalence in cattle carcasses reached up to 7.9 % (8/101) . In a study conducted in Pennsylvania, Houser et al (2012) detected the tpi housekeeping gene in 4 out of 100 cattle carcass swabs by PCR, but C. difficile was not isolated using culture techniques. The same data has been reported in an Australian study of cattle carcasses sampled in the processing area of the slaughter line where none of the samples taken (n ¼ 151) were positive for C. difficile ).…”
Section: Routes Of Food Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of C. difficile in production animals has raised concerns that contaminated meat products could be a potential source of CDI in humans. Reports from North America and, to a lesser extent, Europe describe C. difficile as being isolated from cattle and meat destined for human consumption (13)(14)(15). Nothing is known about the prevalence of C. difficile in Australian production animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%