2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome by different definitions, and its association with type 2 diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular disease risk in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that the CVD risk in patients with MetS was 1.79 times higher than that in non-MetS patients, indicating that MetS can increase the CVD risk, a finding consistent with relevant study results at home and abroad. 13 This study of MetS in the Xinjiang ethnic populations has more important practical significance in predicting the CVD risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We also found that the CVD risk in patients with MetS was 1.79 times higher than that in non-MetS patients, indicating that MetS can increase the CVD risk, a finding consistent with relevant study results at home and abroad. 13 This study of MetS in the Xinjiang ethnic populations has more important practical significance in predicting the CVD risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Esto coincide con estudios realizados en otros países. (24)(25)(26) En Perú, se han realizado poco estudios de SM comparando todas las definiciones utilizadas en este estudio, empleándose generalmente los criterios diagnósticos postulados por la NCEP-ATP III, IDF y JIS. (27)(28)(29) Entre ellos, está el estudio de Arsentales-Montalva et al (30) (k = 0.45).…”
Section: R E V F a C M E Dunclassified
“…The exclusion criteria for our study were as follows: (1) the reviews and letters to the editors, (2) studies that used animal models or in vitro, (3) studies performed outside of Brazil, (4) the study population comprising individuals who were reported to have other health complications, (5) studies with incomplete information (6) or in a speci c population.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%