1968
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1968.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis among 50,915 Indian villagers

Abstract: Images Fig. 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
87
4

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
87
4
Order By: Relevance
“…39 A hospital based survey in cities namely Lucknow, Bombay, Bangalore and Trivandrum recorded prevalence of SMF as 0.51, 0.50, 0.18 and 1.22% respectively. 38 While it has been reported as only 0.55% in the South India, we report 1.3% prevalence in North India.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 A hospital based survey in cities namely Lucknow, Bombay, Bangalore and Trivandrum recorded prevalence of SMF as 0.51, 0.50, 0.18 and 1.22% respectively. 38 While it has been reported as only 0.55% in the South India, we report 1.3% prevalence in North India.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…[36][37][38] In Sri Lanka, the prevalence is reported as 4.0 per 1000, respectively. 29 High prevalence is seen in populations of the Indian subcontinent, affecting persons of all ages and both genders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to restricted oral opening; when the tongue is involved, its protrusion may be impaired. 4 Early lesion present as a blanching of buccal mucosa, imparting a marble-like appearance but later lesions reveal palpable fibrous bands rendering the mucosa pale, thick and stiff. This leads to progressive inability to open the mouth, burning sensation, pain, dysphagia and finally hearing loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a reported prevalence ranging up to 0.4% in Indian rural populations, 4 several million individuals are estimated to suffer from this malady. It has a malignant transformation rates as high as 7.6% [5][6][7] and a relative risk of 397.3 for oral cancer development compared to individuals with tobacco habits but without any precancerous lesion or condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation