2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of porcine circovirus 2 throughout China in 2015–2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalences of 33.2 to 42.0% estimated for 12-week-old to 24-week-old pigs are similar to those reported by previous studies for comparable age groups of pigs in countries such as Mainland China [25], Thailand [38] and Korea [39]. The prevalence in the sows (9.7%) is lower than the 35% reported by [25]. However, as with the PRRSV comparisons, the methodologies used in the PCV2 prevalence studies vary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalences of 33.2 to 42.0% estimated for 12-week-old to 24-week-old pigs are similar to those reported by previous studies for comparable age groups of pigs in countries such as Mainland China [25], Thailand [38] and Korea [39]. The prevalence in the sows (9.7%) is lower than the 35% reported by [25]. However, as with the PRRSV comparisons, the methodologies used in the PCV2 prevalence studies vary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The prevalence of PCV2 in the farmed pig population in the HKSAR was 20.3%, similar to that reported in Korea [26] and the USA [21], but lower than that reported in Mainland China where overall prevalence was estimated at 46% [25]. The prevalences of 33.2 to 42.0% estimated for 12-week-old to 24-week-old pigs are similar to those reported by previous studies for comparable age groups of pigs in countries such as Mainland China [25], Thailand [38] and Korea [39]. The prevalence in the sows (9.7%) is lower than the 35% reported by [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations