2020
DOI: 10.18805/ijar.b-4112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Microorganisms from Mastitis Milk and Their Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern

Abstract: Background: Mastitis is a multi-etiological disease. It leads to physical, chemical and bacteriological changes in milk and pathological changes in glandular tissues. In the present study, prevalence of mastitis causing organisms with special reference to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiotic resistance pattern was studied as Pseudomonas spp. is an important organism in harbouring and transmission of antibiotic resistance in environment.Methods: One hundred and one milk samples from mastitic cattle and buf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the possible synergistic effect of the phenolics compounds with one another (Lopes-Lutz et al, 2008). Also, no antibacterial effect was found for the species Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it is unlikely that this is due to the low concentration of bioactive molecules and ability to develop resistance against multiple classes of antimicrobials which is alarming and concern (Sekhri et al, 2021). The aqueous extract did not indicate antibacterial activity.…”
Section: Antibacterial Activitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because the possible synergistic effect of the phenolics compounds with one another (Lopes-Lutz et al, 2008). Also, no antibacterial effect was found for the species Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it is unlikely that this is due to the low concentration of bioactive molecules and ability to develop resistance against multiple classes of antimicrobials which is alarming and concern (Sekhri et al, 2021). The aqueous extract did not indicate antibacterial activity.…”
Section: Antibacterial Activitymentioning
confidence: 92%